Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

E-selectin S128R polymorphism and severe coronary artery disease in Arabs

  • Khaled K Abu-Amero1Email author,
  • Olayan M Al-Boudari1,
  • Gamal H Mohamed2 and
  • Nduna Dzimiri1
BMC Medical Genetics20067:52

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-7-52

Received: 19 April 2006

Accepted: 06 June 2006

Published: 06 June 2006

Abstract

Background

The E-selectin p. S128R (g. A561C) polymorphism has been associated with the presence of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) in some populations, but no data is currently available on its association with CAD in Arabs.

Methods

In the present study, we determined the potential relevance of the E-selectin S128R polymorphism for severe CAD and its associated risk factors among Arabs. We genotyped Saudi Arabs for this polymorphism by PCR, followed by restriction enzyme digestion.

Results

The polymorphism was determined in 556 angiographically confirmed severe CAD patients and 237 control subjects with no CAD as established angiographically (CON). Frequencies of the S/S, S/R and R/R genotypes were found as 81.1%, 16.6% and 2.3% in CAD patients and 87.8%, 11.8%, and 0.4% in CON subjects, respectively. The frequency of the mutant 128R allele was higher among CAD patients compared to CON group (11% vs. 6%; odds ratio = 1.76; 95% CI 1.14 – 2.72; p = .007), thus indicating a significant association of the 128R allele with CAD among our population. However, the stepwise logistic regression for the 128R allele and different CAD risk factors showed no significant association.

Conclusion

Among the Saudi population, The E-selectin p. S128R (g. A561C) polymorphism was associated with angiographic CAD in Univariate analysis, but lost its association in multivariate analysis.

Background

E-selectin (endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule; ELAM1) is an 11-kD cell surface glycoprotein expressed on endothelial cells after activation by cytokines, and mediates adhesion of circulating monocytes and lymphocytes to endothelial cells. This adherence to activated arterial endothelium is one of the earliest detectable events in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [1]. Double-knockout mouse experiments suggested that E-selectin plays an essential role in both early and advanced stages of atherosclerotic lesion development and that mutations in cellular adhesion molecules like E-selectin may act as genetic risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis [2, 3]. Additionally, the involvement of E-selectin in cardiovascular diseases is suggested by the fact that it is expressed only in activated endothelial cells. Amino acid change from serine (S) to arginine (R) at codon 128 (S128R), which corresponds to A > C nucleotide change at position 561 (A561C), in the epidermal growth factor-like domain of the E-selectin gene has been implicated in the pathogenesis of CAD in several ethnic groups, including Germans, Japanese, Americans, Chinese and Africans [410]. The 128R mutant allele was significantly higher in the CAD patients than in controls (12.6% versus 6.7%, 17.4% versus 7.1%, and 19.5% versus 10.6%) in Japanese, [4] German [11] and white American [6] populations, respectively. However, no previous studies are available on possible association of this polymorphism with CAD among Arabs. Furthermore, apart from a study, which did not find a link between this mutation and CAD in Austrian patients with diabetes mellitus [12], there is hardly any data in the literature pertaining to the possible association of this mutation for the different CAD risk factors. Therefore, the aim of this investigation was to evaluate the potential relevance of E-selectin 128R polymorphism for angiographic CAD and its risk factors in Arabs, using the Saudi population as a study model.

Methods

Study population

Two groups of Saudi individuals were recruited for the present study. The patient group comprised 556 candidates (396 males and 160 females; mean age 50 ± 16 yr) of Saudi Arabian descent with angiographically documented severe CAD. The inclusion criterion for CAD was the presence of angiographically determined narrowing of the coronary vessels by at least 70%, which we define as having severe disease. Exclusion criteria for CAD were major cardiac rhythm disturbances, incapacitating or life-threatening illness, major psychiatric illness or substance abuse, history of cerebral vascular disease, neurological disorder, and administration of psychotropic medication. A second group of 237 individuals (105 males and 132 females, mean age 50 ± 17 yr) undergoing surgery for heart valvular diseases and those who reported with chest pain, but were established to have no significant coronary stenosis by angiography, were recruited as angiographed controls (CON). Exclusion criteria for this group included among others diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disease, or any other disorders likely to interact with variables under investigation. This study was performed in accordance with the regulations laid down by the Hospital Ethics Committee and all participants signed an informed consent.

DNA preparation

Five ml of peripheral blood were collected in EDTA tubes from all participating individuals after obtaining their written consent. DNA was extracted using the PURGENE kit from Gentra Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA), and stored at -20°C in aliquots until required.

Determination of CAD risk factors

Serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were measured as routine in the main Hospital Pathology Laboratory. Triglyceride levels >1.8 mmol/L and total cholesterol levels > 5.2 mmol/L were considered elevated. Diabetic patients either had a known history of diabetes mellitus or were diagnosed as such according to the American Diabetes Association criteria [13]. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction was based on the consensus specified by the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology [14]. Body mass index (BMI) was determined for all participants, and individuals with BMI ≥ 30 were considered obese in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA). Information about all other risk factors was procured either through patient interviews or by referring to their medical records.

Detection of the S128R (A561C) polymorphism

This was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification followed by PstI restriction enzyme digestion. For DNA amplification, we used the forward primer 5'- AGT AAT AGT CCT CCT CAT CAT G -3' and reverse primer 5'- ACC ATC TCA AGT GAA GAA AGA G-3', designed to amplify a 186 bp fragment of the E-selectin gene [6, 11]. Each 25 μl PCR reaction contained 2.5 μl of 10X reaction buffer with MgCl2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA), 10 ρmol of each primer, 100 ρmol/μl each of deoxynucleoside triphophates (deoxyadenosine triphosphate, deoxyguanosine triphosphate, deoxycytidine triphosphate and deoxythymidine triphosphate) (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Foster City, CA, USA) in Tris HCl buffer, 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and 50 ng genomic DNA template. The mixture was denatured at 95°C for 5 min and the PCR reaction was carried out for 35 cycles, in a GeneAmp 9600 PCR system (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Foster City, CA, USA), under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 45 sec, extension at 72°C for 1 min and final extension cycle of 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and detected with 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide to confirm the correct amplicon size. The products were digested using the PstI restriction enzyme (Stratagene, LaJolla, Calif, USA) and the resultant fragments resolved on a 4% MetaPhor agarose gel (FMC Bio-products, Rockland, Maine, USA) in TE buffer containing 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide. The sizes of the digested amplicons were determined using the 50-bp ladder (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). As a quality control, we confirmed by direct sequencing the genotype status of 384 random samples representing the three different genotypes.

Statistical analysis

Genotype frequencies in various groups were compared by Chi-Square test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the effect of the E-selectin 561 C allele (128R allele) on CAD status, incorporating other variables (coronary risk factors) into the model. Additionally, we tried multiple logistic regression models involving the inclusion of interaction of the genotype × different CAD risk factors. All analyses were performed using SPSS v.10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) statistical analysis software. A two-tailed p value < .05 was considered statistically significant. We did power analysis employing the nQuery Adviser version.4 using two scenarios described in the results section and we concluded from this analysis that the study was adequately powered.

Results

In the angiographically confirmed CAD patients (n = 556), 451 (81.1%) were homozygous S/S genotype, 92 (16.6%) were heterozygous S/R and 13 (2.3%) were homozygous for the R/R (Table 1). Among the CON group (n = 237), 208 (87.8%) were S/S, 28 (11.8%) were S/R and 1 (0.4%) was R/R genotype. When we compared the prevalence of the different genotypes between the CAD and CON groups, the odds ratio for the S/R genotype was 1.52 (95% CI: 0.94 – 2.45; p = .07) and that for the R/R genotype was 6.0 (95% CI: 0.82 – 123.6; p = .05).
Table 1

Crude odds ratio for all CAD risk factors among CAD and CON groups

Risk factor

Status

Total

CAD

CON

Odds ratio

95% C.I

Pvalue

Genotype

S/S

659

451

208

-

-

-

 

S/R

120

92

28

1.52

0.94 – 2.45

.07

 

R/R

14

13

1

6.0

0.82 – 123.6

.05

Alleles

S

1438

994

444

-

-

-

 

R

148

118

30

1.76

1.14 – 2.72

.007

Age

< 40

207

139

68

-

-

-

 

≥ 40

586

417

169

1.20

0.86 – 1.69

.29

Hypercholesterolemia

No

252

73

179

-

-

-

 

Yes

541

483

58

20.4

13.8 – 30.0

<.001

DM

No

382

194

188

-

-

-

 

Yes

411

362

49

7.16

4.9 – 10.2

<.001

FH

No

544

376

168

-

-

-

 

Yes

249

180

69

1.1

0.84 – 1.62

.40

Gender

F

292

160

132

-

-

-

 

M

501

396

105

3.11

2.3 – 4.3

<.001

Hypertension

No

120

49

71

-

-

-

 

Yes

673

507

166

4.42

2.95 – 6.62

<.001

MI

No

599

368

231

-

-

-

 

Yes

194

188

6

19.7

8.5 – 45.1

<.001

Obesity

No

73

45

28

-

-

-

 

Yes

720

511

209

0.65

0.39 – 1.08

.07

Smoking

No

667

462

205

-

-

-

 

Yes

126

94

32

1.30

0.84 – 2.01

.25

Hypertriglyceridemia

No

247

90

157

-

-

-

 

Yes

546

466

80

10.2

7.1 – 14.4

<.001

DM, diabetes Mellitus; FH, family history of CAD; MI, myocardial infarction on admission; hypertriglyceridemia (>1.8 mmol/L); hypercholesterolemia (> 5.2 mmol/L) and obesity (Body Mass Index ≥ 30).

We found that the mutant 128R allele accounted for 11% in the CAD group, which was significantly higher than that in the CON group (6%). The odds ratio for the risk of CAD associated with the 128R allele was 1.76 (95% CI 1.14 – 2.72; p = .007), thus indicating a significant association of this allele with CAD in our population.

The variables showing an association (p =< .05) from Table 1, were then put into a stepwise logistic regression, in order to study the possible combined effect of the mutant 128R allele with other risk factors on angiographic CAD. The variables retained in the model were hypertension (p = .03), diabetes mellitus (DM) (p =< .001), hypercholesterolemia (p =< .001), hypertriglyceridemia (p = .008), MI (p =< .001) and gender (p =< .001) (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of multiple logistic regression analysis: final significant variables in equation

Risk Factor (variables)

Odds ratio

[95% C.I]

pvalue

Hypertension

1.53

1.03 – 2.26

.03

DM

3.95

2.85 – 5.48

<.001

Hypercholesterolemia

7.96

5.30 – 11.9

<.001

Hypertriglyceridemia

1.72

1.15 – 2.58

.008

MI

14.1

7.45 – 26.7

<.001

Gender

2.36

1.73 – 3.23

<.001

As for the power calculation, we did power analysis employing nQuery Adviser version 4 using two scenarios as follow: First, In our study, when we compared the risk of CAD among (S/R and R/R) to S/S, we got an odds ratio of 1.67 (p = .023). When α =.05, using 2 sided test, proportion of S/R and R/R among CAD is .189 and among controls is .122. Number of controls = 237, number of cases = 556 (we used the average, which is 397). Using this information we have calculated the power in nQuery as 74%. Second, In our study, when we analyzed the risk of CAD among (R alleles) compared to S alleles, we got an odds ratio of 1.7 (p = .007). When α = .05, using 2 sided test, proportion of C alleles among CAD is .106 and among controls is .063. Number of controls = 474, number of cases = 1112 (we used the average, which is 793). Using this information, we have calculated the power in nQuery as 86%. From this power calculation, we concluded that our study is adequately powered.

Discussion

In the past 3 decades, the incidence of CAD is on the rise in Saudi Arabia. According to the biggest study conducted so far, the overall prevalence of this disease in Saudi Arabia is 5.5% [15]. The rise in the incidence of CAD has been attributed to the major changes in the life-style of the Saudi population. High-fat diets, obesity, diabetes, and smoking, all of which are considered CAD risk factors, have become more prevalent, and people are leading a more sedentary lifestyle. Two independent studies reported predicted an incremental scale for the development of CAD in the Saudi population because of sharp increases in CAD risk factors such as obesity, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia, and high blood pressure [16, 17]. Early detection of individuals genetically susceptible to CAD can lead to early intervention, and knowledge of genetic susceptibility to CAD has value in providing risk information and guiding decision-making. To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the prevalence of E-selectin polymorphism (S128R) and its potential relevance for angiographic CAD and its associated risk factors in the Arab population. The first step was to determine the prevalence of different E-selectin genotypes among our general population of Saudi Arabs. We found that the S/S is the most abundant and R/R the least common genotype among Arabs. The prevalence of the 128R allele was 6% in our controls, which is almost similar to the rate observed in the Germans (7.1%) and Japanese (6.7%) and slightly higher that in Africans (3.7%) [9] and Chinese (0%) [10]. When we compared the genotype frequencies in CAD versus CON group, the odds ratio was significant, indicating an association between these genotypes and CAD.

However, possibly because of the relatively small number of individuals with the S/R and R/R genotype, this analysis did not attain significance see Table 1. On the other hand, a significant odds ratio and p value was obtained when we compared the frequency of the 128R mutant allele in CAD and CON groups, pointing to an association of this allele with CAD among our Saudi Arab population. These results are comparable to the findings in the Japanese [4], German [11] white American [6] and Chinese [10] populations, but in contrast to a previous study in CAD patients with type 2 DM [12]. Although the frequencies of several classical risk factors for CAD, including elevated cholesterol and triglycerides levels, DM, age, hypertension, gender and MI were higher in the CAD patients compared to controls, when we entered these risk factors with the mutant 128R allele into a multiple variable logistic regression, the association was no longer significant.

Conclusion

In summary, the mutant 128R allele of the E-selectin gene is associated with angiographic severe CAD in Saudi Arabs. This association is lost after adjustment for traditional CAD risk factors.

Abbreviations

BMI

Body Mass Index

CAD

Coronary artery disease

CI

Confidence interval

CON

Control group

DM

Diabetes mellitus

FH

Family history of CAD

MI

Myocardial infarction

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

R

Arginine

S

Serine

TG

Triglycerdies

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the "Research Center of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center", under the project # 2010020, for which we express our gratitude.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Genetics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (MBC – 03)
(2)
Department of Biostatics, Epidemiology and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (MBC – 03)

References

  1. Ross R: Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am Heart J. 1999, 138 (5 Pt 2): S419-20. 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70266-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dong ZM, Chapman SM, Brown AA, Frenette PS, Hynes RO, Wagner DD: The combined role of P- and E-selectins in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1998, 102 (1): 145-152.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Lusis AJ, Fogelman AM, Fonarow GC: Genetic basis of atherosclerosis: part I: new genes and pathways. Circulation. 2004, 110 (13): 1868-1873. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143041.58692.CC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yoshida M, Takano Y, Sasaoka T, Izumi T, Kimura A: E-selectin polymorphism associated with myocardial infarction causes enhanced leukocyte-endothelial interactions under flow conditions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23 (5): 783-788. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000067427.40133.59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wenzel K, Felix S, Kleber FX, Brachold R, Menke T, Schattke S, Schulte KL, Glaser C, Rohde K, Baumann G, et al: E-selectin polymorphism and atherosclerosis: an association study. Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3 (11): 1935-1937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ye SQ, Usher D, Virgil D, Zhang LQ, Yochim SE, Gupta R: A PstI polymorphism detects the mutation of serine128 to arginine in CD 62E gene - a risk factor for coronary artery disease. J Biomed Sci. 1999, 6 (1): 18-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zheng F, Chevalier JA, Zhang LQ, Virgil D, Ye SQ, Kwiterovich PO: An HphI polymorphism in the E-selectin gene is associated with premature coronary artery disease. Clin Genet. 2001, 59 (1): 58-64. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bannan S, Mansfield MW, Grant PJ: Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin levels in relation to vascular risk factors and to E-selectin genotype in the first degree relatives of NIDDM patients and in NIDDM patients. Diabetologia. 1998, 41 (4): 460-466. 10.1007/s001250050930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller MA, Kerry SM, Dong Y, Sagnella GA, Cook DG, Cappuccio FP: Circulating soluble E-selectin levels and the Ser128Arg polymorphism in individuals from different ethnic groups. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2005, 15 (1): 65-70. 10.1016/j.numecd.2004.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li Y, Wei YS, Wang M, Zhang PA, Jiang XJ, Huang CX: Association between the Ser128Arg variant of the E-selectin and risk of coronary artery disease in the central China. Int J Cardiol. 2005, 103 (1): 33-36. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rauchhaus M, Gross M, Schulz S, Francis DP, Greiser P, Norwig A, Weidhase L, Coats AJ, Dietz R, Anker SD, Glaser C: The E-selectin SER128ARG gene polymorphism and restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol. 2002, 83 (3): 249-257. 10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00073-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Endler G, Exner M, Raith M, Marculescu R, Mannhalter C, Endler L, Wojta J, Huber K, Wagner OF: The E-selectin S128R polymorphism is not a risk factor for coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Thromb Res. 2003, 112 (1-2): 47-50. 10.1016/j.thromres.2003.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (Suppl 1): S5-20.Google Scholar
  14. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP: Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000, 36 (3): 959-969. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Khan NB, Khalil MZ, Al-Khadra AH, Al-Marzouki K, Abdullah MA, Al-Harthi SS, Al-Shahid MS, Nouh MS, Al-Mobeireek A: Coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004, 25 (9): 1165-1171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Al-Humaidi MA: Probability of coronary artery disease among patients attending primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Southwest Saudi Arabia. Ethn Dis. 2000, 10 (3): 350-356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Osman AK, al-Nozha MM: Risk factors of coronary artery disease in different regions of Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2000, 6 (2-3): 465-474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/7/52/prepub

Copyright

© Abu-Amero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement