Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Frequency of common HFEvariants in the Saudi population: a high throughput molecular beacon-based study

  • Osama A Alsmadi1Email author,
  • Fadi Al-Kayal1,
  • Mohamed Al-Hamed1 and
  • Brian F Meyer1
BMC Medical Genetics20067:43

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-7-43

Received: 11 February 2006

Accepted: 03 May 2006

Published: 03 May 2006

Abstract

Background

Hereditary Hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder highlighted byiron-overload. Two popular mutations in HFE, p.C282Y and p.H63D, have been discovered and found to associate with HH in different ethnic backgrounds. p.C282Y and p.H63D diagnosis is usually made byrestriction enzyme analysis. However, the use of this technique is largelylimited to research laboratories because they are relativelyexpensive, time-consuming, and difficult to transform into a high throughput format.

Methods

Single nucleotide variations in target DNA sequences can be readily identified using molecular beacon fluorescent probes. These are quenched probes with loop and hairpin structure, and they become fluorescent upon specific target recognition. We developed high throughput homogeneous real-time PCR assays using molecular beacon technology, to genotype p.C282Y and p.H63D variants. Representative samples of different genotypes for these variants were assayed by restriction enzyme analysis and direct sequencing as bench mark methods for comparison with the newly developed molecular beacon-based real-time PCR assay.

Results

Complete concordance was achieved by all three assay formats. Homozygotes (mutant and wildtype) and heterozygotes were readily differentiated by the allele specific molecular beacons as reported by the associated fluorophore in the real-time assay developed in this study. Additionally, these assays were used in a high throughput format to establish the allele frequency of C282Y and H63D in Saudis for the first time.

Conclusion

These assays may be reliably applied as a diagnostic test or large scale method for population screening.

Background

Hereditary Hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder highlighted byiron-overload [1]. HH was recognized more than a century ago as a condition with three symptoms: diabetes, skin bronzing, and cirrhosis [2]. In Caucasians, HH affects 3–8 in every 1000 individuals, with an approximately 10% prevalence of heterozygous carriers [3]. The molecular basis for HH was completely unknown untilthe identification in 1996 of a gene onchromosome 6p, designated HLA-H, subsequently renamed HFE [4]. A cysteine-to-tyrosine substitution at position282 in the HFE protein (p.C282Y), has been observed in the majorityof HH patients, with frequencies ranging from 64% to 100% in subjects (fromdifferent geographic areas) who have hemochromatosis [57]. A substitution of histidine by aspartic acid at position 63 (p.H63D) in the HFE protein, was also linked to an additional 1–10% of HH cases [5]. Large population-based studies are required to definitively establish the prevalence of these mutations on an ethnic and or geographic basis. A recently described third mutation, which substitutes cysteine for serine at position65 (p.S65C) of the HFE protein, is enriched in HH individuals who have a mild form of the disease and lack the p.C282Y or p.H63D mutations [8]. The overall impact of this third mutation is currently unclear. Whilst many other mutations of HFE associated with the hemochromatosis phenotype have been described, they appear to be rare or "private" mutations [9].

The diagnosis of hemochromatosis was previously based on a combined clinical and laboratory assessment including physical examination, elevated transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin. Pedigree studies have boosted the acceptance of HH genetic screening in several countries [10]. The most established screening test for HH is transferrin saturation. The sensitivity of transferrin saturation for the diagnosis of HH has been reported to be 94% based on a population screening study from Busselton, Australia [11]. Today, the diagnosis of HH has shifted from clinical symptoms and biochemical assessment towards genetic testing. Genetic testing for HFE mutations now plays a central role in confirming the clinical diagnosis of HH. Several molecular methods have been used to screen for the common HH mutations, p.C282Y and p.H63D. The methods include allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization (ASO) [12], restriction enzyme (RE) analysis [4], and the invader assay [13]. High throughput ASO methods require up to two days to complete, include multiple post PCR steps and often use radioactive reagents, all factors likely to discourage application of this format. RE also requires several post PCR steps including an overnight digestion and analysis of ethidium bromide stained gels, and can potentially lead to PCR contamination as a result of excess handling. The invader assay on the other hand, is an isothermal high throughput assay, but requires complicated design of both signal and invader probes which must work in tandem and involve multi-step intermolecular events. Genotypes are assigned after determination of the net wild-type/variant signal ratios, which can potentially lead to genotyping miscalls. The use of these techniques have enabled several HFE population studies, however, these techniques remainlimited to research laboratories as they are relativelyexpensive, time-consuming, and in some cases difficult to transform into a robust high throughput format.

Molecular beacons are single-stranded oligonucleotide probes with a stem-and-loop hairpin structure [14]. The loop domain of the molecular beacon is complementary to the target sequence and contains the mutation site usually embedded centrally. The molecular beacon is labeled with a flourophore at one end and a quencher, 4'-(4-dimethylaminophenylazo) benzoic acid (DABCYL), at the other end. When the specific target is encountered, the molecular beacon forms a hybrid with the target leading to conformational changes that position the flourophore away from the quencher. As a result, fluorescence of the molecular beacon is restored signaling presence of the associated allele. Under optimal conditions, instability of mismatched hybrids increases the specificity of molecular beacons, making them the perfect probes for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping or for detection of point/small mutations. Molecular beacons can each be conjugated to different fluorophores enabling simultaneous detection of any genotype in a closed tube homogeneous assay [1416]. In addition, they eliminate the need for agarose gel analysis of PCR products because the entire assay fromamplification to detection is performed in the same microwell, allow SNPs to be analyzedin less than 2 hours and genotyping calls can be reliably automated.

In this report we describe the design and validation of 2 molecular beacon-based real-time PCR assays for the detection of the common HH mutations, p.C282Y and p.H63D.

Methods

DNA samples

A total of 23 samples of known genotypes for the p.C282Y and p.H63D mutations were selected and anonymized prior to being used in assay development and validation. The samples originated from patients referred to our laboratory for HFE genotyping. Routinely, these samples are assayed using a restriction digestion based methodology. For population studies, we utilized a total of 540 random, anonymized newborn dried blood spots (DBS) as a source of template DNA. The neonatal DBS are routinely sent from multiple birth centers across Saudi Arabia to the National Laboratory for Newborn Screening in our institution. The likelihood of these samples originating from closely related subjects is virtually negligible but cannot be completely excluded. Sample collection and enrollment in this study was approved by our institutional review board (IRB) according to guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Whole genome amplification (WGA)

DNA was amplified from dried blood spots using a modified WGA method [17]. A Repli_g 100 kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used for amplification. In brief, 1.2 mm punch biopsies were derived from the dried blood spots using a Harris Micro Punch (Whatman Inc, USA), and dispensed into 96-well plates. The punch biopsies were then soaked with 20 μl of PBS, followed by addition of 20 μl of lysis solution A according to the manufacturers recommendations. The plates were allowed to sit on ice for 10 minutes to allow release of nuclei from the discs. Each sample was then neutralized by adding 20 μl of solution B. From each lysis mix, 2 μl was transferred to 8 μl of the WGA reaction mix present in each well of a 96-well micro plate, bringing the final reaction volume to 10 μl per sample. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 16 hr at 30°C on an MJ Research thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA)and terminated by heating to 65°C for 5 min. Dilutions from the crude amplification mixture were directly used for genotyping.

HFEgenotyping by restriction enzyme digestion

Restriction digestion was carried out as described [4]. Briefly, two amplicons encompassing the p.C282Y and p.H63D mutation sites were generated by PCR prior to restriction digestion analysis. Amplification was performed in total volume of 25 μl. PCR reactions were carried out using an MJ Research thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). Each PCR reaction contained 100 ng gDNA, 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM forward/reverse primers, and 1U Taq polymerase (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The primers TGGCAAGGGTAAACAGATCC and CTCAGCTCCTGGCTCTCAT were used to generate a 357 bp genomic fragment that contained the c.845G>A mutation site in the HFE gene. Primers ACATGGTTAAGGCCTGTTGC and CTTGCTGTGGTTGTGATTTTCC were used to generate a 294 bp genomic fragment that contains the c.187C>G mutation site in the HFE gene. In each instance, amplification was performed after an initial activation step for Taq polymerase of 15 minutes at 95°C followed by 35 cycles each of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 56°C, and 1 min at 72°C. A final extension step of 10 min at 72°C was also used. Following PCR, restriction enzyme digestion reactions were set up as follows: 10 μl PCR product, 2 μl restriction enzyme (RE), and 1X RE buffer. RsaI (10 u/μl), and MboI (10 u/μl) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), were used to digest the c.845G>A and c.187C>G mutation-containing fragments respectively. Digestion products were run on a 2% agarose gel for 30 min at 120V.

PCR and direct sequencing

Amplicons encompassing the p.C282Y and p.H63D mutation sites of HFE were generated by PCR amplification using gDNA samples. Primer pairs used generated 388 bp and 486 bp fragments for p.C282Y and p.H63D respectively. Sequencing reactions were performed using an Amersham ET Dye Terminator sequencing kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) following the manufacturers instructions. Sequencing reactions were desalted and unincorporated nucleotides removed using ethanol precipitation, and then re-suspended in a formamide EDTA solution for injection on a MegaBACE 1000 capillary electrophoresis system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Sequence analysis was performed using the SeqMan module of the Lasergene software package (DNA Star Inc, Madison, WI, USA) by comparing alignments of multiple samples with each other and a Genbank reference sequence (U60319).

Genotyping by molecular beacon assays

Real-time small scale PCR assays were performed in 0.2 ml clear flat top tubes (Phenix, Hayward, CA, USA) for use with the Rotor Gene 3000 (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). For large scale assays, 384-well clear optical reaction plates were used with the ABI Prism 7900 HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR mixtures consisted of 1X qPCR mastermix plus (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium), 0.5 μM forward/reverse primers, 0.25 μM of each molecular beacon probe, and 20 ng of gDNA template. Reaction tubes were subjected to an initial 2 min incubation at 50°C (Uracil-N-glycosylase will eliminate carry over amplicon contaminants in this step), then a 10 min incubation at 95°C for Taq polymerase activation, followed by 40 PCR cycles. Cycling conditions were 95°C denaturation for 10 sec, 58°C annealing for 30 sec, and 72°C extension for 30 sec. A negative control (deionised water) was included in each assay. The following allele-specific molecular beacons and primers were designed and used in the assays (all were sourced from Proligo, Paris, France):

p.C282Y assay

Wild type beacon: FAM-ccggc AGATATACGTGCCAGGTGG gccgg-DABCYL

Mutant beacon: TET-ccgcc GAGATATACGTACCAGGTGGA ggcgg-DABCYL

Forward primer: GGCTGGATAACCTTGGCTGT

Reverse primer: GATCACAATGAGGGGCTGAT

p.H63D assay

Wild type beacon: FAM-ccgctg CTATGATCATGAGAGTCGCC cagcgg-DABCYL

Mutant beacon: TET-ccgctg CTATGATGATGAGAGTCGCC cagcgg-DABCYL

Forward primers: CTTTGGGCTACGTGGATGAC

Reverse primer: TGGCTTGAAATTCTACTGGAAA

In the beacon sequences, underlined lower case bases refer to the complementary arms. Bolded and capitalized bases represent the allelic variants at each locus. For the beacons design, we have used mfold [18] for appropriate probe folding. Genotype calling of DNA samples was determined by measuring the threshold cycle (Ct) value for each sample. Fluorescence data was collected during each annealing step throughout cycling at which point the molecular beacon is bound to its complementary target amplicon. Results were displayed as an amplification plot for fluorescence versus cycle number. The threshold cycle is the cycle at which the fluorescent signal is first reported above the set baseline fluorescence. The baseline fluorescence was set at 10% above the average fluorescence value of PCR cycles 1 through 18. Genotyping of DNA samples was based on positive threshold cycles for FAM, TET, or both. Positive Ct values were usually detected between cycles 25–30, and indicated the presence of specific allele(s).

Results

C282Y and H63D genotyping of HFEby PCR/restriction enzyme analysis

Both of p.C282Y and p.H63D mutations alter restriction-enzyme sites, providing a method for genotyping. c.845G>A creates a recognition site for RsaI; c.187C>G abolishes the DNA sequence recognition site for MboI. RsaI was used for restriction analysis of an amplicon (357 bp undigested; Figure 1A, lane 2) containing the p.C282Y mutation site of HFE. Representative restriction analysis using the control samples is shown in Figure 1. Following RsaI digestion a homozygous wild type sample (GG) produces two fragments (Figure 1A, lane 3: 250 and 107 bp), whereas a homozygous mutant sample (AA) results in three fragments (Figure 1A, lane 4: 250, 78, and 29 bp). For heterozygotes, four fragments (Figure 1A, lane 5: 250, 107, 78, and 29 bp) were present following RsaI digestions. Similarly MboI was used for restriction analysis of an amplicon (294 bp undigested; Figure 1B, lane 2) containing the p.H63D mutation site of HFE. Following MboI digestion a homozygous wildtype sample (CC) produces three fragments (Figure 1B, lane 3: 138, 99 and 57 bp), whereas a homozygous mutant sample (GG) generates two fragments (Figure 1B, lane 4: 237 and 57 bp). For heterozygote sample (CG) four fragments (Figure 1B, lane 5: 237, 138, 99, and 57 bp) were present following digestion.
Figure 1

2% agarose gel showing the restriction digestion fragments for detection of p.C282Y (1A) and p.H63D (1B) mutations. Undigested (UD), normal (+/+), mutant (-/-), and heterozygote (+/-).

Direct sequencing of HFEamplicons containing the p.C282Y and p.H63D sites

Direct sequencing of amplicons containing the p.C282Y and p.H63D sites of HFE were performed on both strands for all 23 patients and three control samples. Sequencing results of all 23 samples and the controls were 100% concordant with that achieved using PCR and restriction analysis.

p.C282Y and p.H63D genotyping by molecular-beacon based real-time PCR assays

p.C282Y and p.H63D genotyping was carried out by using two independent molecular beacon-based homogeneous assays. Representative results of assays for C282Y and p.H63D using sequence validated controls are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. These results were generated using the Corbett 3000 system; identical profiles are also observed when the assay is run on the ABI Prism 7900 HT sequence detection system. Ct values were detected in these assays usually between cycles 25 and 30, and indicate the presence of specific allele(s) depending on the positive signal(s) that are detected. For both of these assays, wild type and variant allele-detecting molecular beacons were labeled with FAM and TET respectively. FAM channel only positive signal indicated a homozygous wild type genotype. Conversely TET channel only positive signal indicated a homozygous mutant genotype. FAM positive/TET positive channels indicate a heterozygote genotype. p.C282Y and p.H63D real-time assay cycling parameters were optimized to be identical thus permitting simultaneous analysis of both genotypes, albeit in independent reactions. Genotyping of p.C282Y and p.H63D variants was accomplished by real-time PCR amplification of C282Y- and H63D-containg amplicons in the presence of the allele-specific molecular beacons for these variants. Relative fluorescence was monitored using the Rotor Gene 3000 real-time thermal cycler, and representative genotyping results are shown in Figures 2 (p.C282Y) and 3 (p.H63D). Using this real-time PCR method, genotyping of all 23 test samples was in complete concordance with the results achieved using restriction enzyme analysis and direct sequencing.
Figure 2

FAM signal; TET signal Representative real-time PCR genotyping results for p.C282Y variants are shown. (A) Normal (FAM positive, TET negative), (B) mutant genotype (FAM negative TET positive), and (C) heterozygote (FAM positive TET positive).

Figure 3

FAM signal; TET signal Representative real-time PCR genotyping results for p.C282Y variants are shown. (A) Normal (FAM positive, TET negative), (B) mutant genotype (FAM negative TET positive), and (C) heterozygote (FAM positive TET positive).

High throughput population genotyping for p.C282Y and p.H63D

Here we analyzed a total of 540 DNA samples obtained from anonymized newborn dry bloodspots. DNA was amplified from these spots using whole genome amplification (WGA) technology. WGA provides a comprehensive whole genome coverage and minimal loci bias [19]. The WGA method provides unlimited quantities of DNA directly from a variety of samples types including dried blood spots. p.C282Y and p.H63D genotyping was facilitated by the use of the two molecular beacon assays which we developed and that were readily applicable for genotyping of a large number of samples. Using this approach on a cost per sample basis in respect of both reagents and time the molecular beacon based assay was more economical than restriction enzyme analysis or direct sequencing. This is based upon a requirement for 1,000 or more assays which introduces an economy of scale with respect to the synthesis of molecular beacons and assumes availability of real-time PCR instrumentation. Based upon these numbers, the reagent cost of each of the beacon assays described here. has been calculated at <US$ 1.0, This is compared to a 3–4 fold more reagent cost when alternative methodology such as RE or sequencing is considered and reflects the single step beacon procedure as opposed to the multi-step nature of alternatives. Clearly the single step beacon procedure is similarly advantageous when viewed in terms of technician time. The overall p.C282Y genotyping resulted in no mutant alleles being detected as all subjects were homozygous (GG) for the wildtype allele. This result indicates the mutant or variant A allele to be very rare (frequency < 0.001) in the Saudi population. On the other hand, p.H63D genotyping analysis showed genotypes as follows: 380 (70.4%) subjects were wildtype homozygotes (CC), 129 (23.9%) subjects were heterozygotes (CG) and 31 (5.7%) were homozygote mutants (GG). Based on these genotypes, the Saudi allele frequencies are 0.823 and 0.177 for the normal (C) and risk (G) alleles respectively at this locus. Based on the risk allele frequencies observed in this study, C282Y mutation (< 0.001) was comparable to that reported in Bulgaria and lower than all other population studies published thus far. The H63D (0.177) was higher than most of the European populations, Hispanics, Asians, but less than that observed in Bulgarians, Spanish, and Portuguese [20].

Discussion

Three genotyping methods were compared in this study independently using DNA samples representing all possible genotypes of the p.C282Y and p.H63D mutations of HFE. We have developed and validated two new molecular beacon-based real-time PCR genotyping assays, and performed a head to head comparison against the restriction enzyme digestion and direct sequencing reference methods. Even though HFE genotyping in other laboratories is already automated and does not provide a major technical obstacle, molecular beacon-based real-time PCR genotyping may provide a cheaper and more efficient alternative, particularly for large studies.

Both the new real-time PCR assays provided unambiguous genotyping in total concordance with reference methods. These real-time assays were simple, inexpensive, fast, and less labor intensive in relation to restriction digestion-based mutation analysesand direct sequencing. Therefore, the closed-tube allelic discrimination assays developed by this study have several advantages over other mutation detection techniques: a) the hairpin-shaped molecular beacons are extremely specific in distinguishing single base-pair variants; b) there is significant reduction of post-PCR cross-contamination risk, and c) the technology can readily be adapted to a high-throughput format (e.g., 96 or 384-well assays). For this purpose, we used the molecular beacon based assay for analysis of 540 random anonymized DNA samples derived from Saudi newborn subjects, using the 384-well genotyping format and the ABI Prism 7900 HT sequence detection system. Genotyping could be performed in less than two hours per run allowing the analysis of thousands of DNA samples per day. Such a true high throughput setting is essential to the performance of large population-based studies for the establishment of allele frequencies. The establishment of population based allele frequencies for common disease related mutations or variants are a necessary prelude to the clinical use of genotyping of these loci.

Population HFE studies for most of the world regions are missing, and previous genotyping studies indicated that siblings of non-expressing (asymptomatic) homozygotes have been found to have iron overload [10, 21]. In the Saudi population incidence of the HFE A (or risk allele of P.C282Y), which is the primary mutation underlying HH in other populations, was extremely low (<0.001). Alternately, incidence (0.177) of the C or risk allele underlying the HFE p.H63D mutation was relatively common based upon reports in other populations [4, 22, 23]. Collectively the data suggests that the Saudi population is either at low risk for HH or that novel mutations of HFE may play a role in this population. The high incidence of p.H63D would elevate risk but does not have as strong an association with HH as p.C282Y [11, 2426]. Sequencing of HFE in clinically well characterized patients of Saudi origin with HH is indicated to clearly establish the role of p.H63D or novel HFE mutations in this population.

Conclusion

The two assays which we have developed and presented here possess adequate target specificity and are readily performed in a high throughput format. These assays may be reliably applied as a diagnostic test or large scale method to facilitate world-wide population based studies.

Abbreviations

(HH): 

Hereditary Hemochromatosis

(SNP): 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

(IRB): 

Institutional Review Board

(ASO): 

Allele-specific oligonucleotide

(RE): 

Restriction Enzyme

(WGA): 

Whole Genome Amplification

(DBS): 

Dry Blood Spots

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work funded by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC). We thank both the hospital and the research centre for their support and cooperation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Arabian Diagnostic Laboratory, Research Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

References

  1. Adams PC, Valberg LS: Evolving expression of hereditary haemochromatosis. Semin Liver Dis. 1996, 16: 47-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lawrie WP, George KD, McDonnell SM, Kowdley KV: Diagnosis of Hemochromatosis. SUPPLEMENT Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998, 129: 925-931.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerhard GS, Ten Elshof AE, Chorney MJ: Hereditary haemochromatosis as an immunological disease. Br J Haematol. 1998, 100: 247-255. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00549.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Feder JN, Gnirke A, homas W, Tsuchihashi Z, Ruddy DA, Basava A, Dormishian F, Domingo R, Ellis MC, Fullan A, Hinton LM, Jones NL, Kimmel BE, Kronma lGS, Lauer P, Lee VK, Loeb DB, Mapa FA, McClelland E, Meyer NC, Mintier GA, Moeller N, Moore T, Morikang E, Prass CE, Quintana L, Starnes SM, Schatzman RC, Brunke KJ, Drayna DT, Risch NJ, Bacon BR, Wolff RK: A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nat Genet. 1996, 13: 399-408. 10.1038/ng0896-399.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke W, Thomson EJ, Khoury MJ, McDonnell SM, Press N, Adams PC, Barton JC, Beutler E, Brittenham G, Buchanan A, Clayton EW, Cogswell ME, Meslin EM, Motulsky AG, Powell LW, Sigal E, Wilfond BS, Collins FS: Hereditary hemochromatosis: gene discovery and its implications for population-based screening. JAMA. 1998, 280: 172-178. 10.1001/jama.280.2.172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carella M, D'Ambrosio L, Totaro A, Grifa A, Valentino MA, Piperno A, Girelli D, Roetto A, Franco B, Gasparini P, Camaschella C: Mutation analysis of the HLA-H gene in Italian hemochromatosis patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60: 828-832.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jazwinska EC, Cullen LM, Busfield F, Pyper WR, Webb SI, Powell LW, Morris CP, Walsh TP: Haemochromatosis and HLA-H. Nat Genet. 1996, 14: 249-251. 10.1038/ng1196-249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mura C, Raguenes O, Claude F: HFE Mutations Analysis in 711 Hemochromatosis Probands: Evidence for S65C Implication in Mild Form of Hemochromatosis. Blood. 1999, 93 (8): 2502-2505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Gac G, Ferec C: The molecular genetics of haemochromatosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005, 13 (11): 1172-1185. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Adams PC, Chakrabarti S: Genotypic/phenotypic correlation in genetic haemochromatosis: evolution of diagnostic criteria. Gastroenterology. 1998, 114: 319-323. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70483-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Olynyk JK, Cullen DJ, Aquilia S, Rossi E, Summerville L, Powell LW: A population-based study of the clinical expression of the hemochromatosis gene. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 718-274. 10.1056/NEJM199909023411002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beutler E, Gelbart T: Large-scale screening for HFE mutations: methodology and cost. Genet Test. 2000, 4 (2): 131-142. 10.1089/10906570050114830.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Barton JC, McLaren CE, Eckfeldt JH, McLaren GD, Dawkins FW, Acton RT, Harris EL, Gordeuk VR, Leiendecker-Foster C, Speechley M, Snively BM, Holup JL, Thomson E, Sholinsky P: Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (17): 1769-1778. 10.1056/NEJMoa041534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tyagi S, Kramer FR: Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat Biotechnol. 1996, 14: 303-308. 10.1038/nbt0396-303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonnet G, Tyagi S, Libchaber A, Kramer FR: Thermodynamic basis of the enhanced specificity of structured DNA probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 6171-6176. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6171.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Marras SA, Kramer FR, Tyagi S: Genotyping SNPs with molecular beacons. Methods Mol Biol. 2003, 212: 111-128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean F, Hosono S, Fang L, Wu X, Faruqi A, Bray-Ward P, Sun Z, Zong Q, Y D, Du J, Driscoll M, Song W, Kingsmore S, Egholm M, Lasken R: Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (8): 5261-5266. 10.1073/pnas.082089499.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Website title. [http://www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/applications/mfold/old/dna/]
  19. Hosono SA, Faruqi F, Dean FB, Du Y, Sun Z, Wu X, Du J, Kingsmore SF, Egholm M, Lasken RS: Unbiased Whole-Genome Amplification Directly From Clinical Samples. Genome Research. 2003, 13: 954-964. 10.1101/gr.816903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cimburova M, Putova I, Provaznikova H, Pinterova D, Horak J: S65C and other mutations in the haemochromatosis gene in the Czech population. Folia Biol (Praha). 2005, 51 (6): 172-176.Google Scholar
  21. Adams PC, Campion ML, Gwandon G, et al: Clinical and family studies in genetic hemochromatosis: microsatellite and HFE studies in five atypical families. Hepatology. 1997, 26: 986-990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gochee PA, Powell LW, Cullen DJ, Du Sart D, Rossi E, Olynyk JK: A population-based study of the biochemical and clinical expression of the H63D hemochromatosis mutation. Gastroenterology. 2002, 122 (3): 646-651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Burke W, Imperatore G, McDonnell SM, Baron RC, Khoury MJ: Contribution of different HFE genotypes to iron overload disease: a pooled analysis. Genetics In Medicine. 2000, 2 (5): 271-277. 10.1097/00125817-200009000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Adams PC, Kertesz AE, McLaren CE, Barr R, Bamford A, Chakrabarti S: Population screening for hemochromatosis: a comparison of unbound iron-binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and C282Y genotyping in 5,211 voluntary blood donors. Hepatology. 2000, 31 (5): 1160-1164. 10.1053/he.2000.6984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Altes A, Ruiz A, Barcelo J, Remacha AF, Puig T, Maya AJ, Castell C, Amate J, Saz Z, Baiget M: Prevalence of the C282Y, H63D, and S65C Mutations of the HFE Gene in 1,146 Newborns from a Region of Northern Spain. GENETIC TESTING. 2004, 8 (4):
  26. Byrnes V, Ryan E, Barrett S, Kenny P, Mayne P, Crowe J: Genetic hemochromatosis, a Celtic disease: is it now time for population screening?. Genet Test. 2001, 5 (2): 127-130. 10.1089/109065701753145583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/7/43/prepub

Copyright

© Alsmadi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement