Effect of human leukocyte antigen heterozygosity on infectious disease outcome: The need for allele-specific measures
© Lipsitch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 21 October 2002
Accepted: 24 January 2003
Published: 24 January 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Oct 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Oct 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Rabinowitz|
|19 Nov 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Schliekelman|
|10 Dec 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wayne Potts|
|25 Dec 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Marc Lipsitch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Dec 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Marc Lipsitch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jan 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jan 2003||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2350-4-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.