Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Novel TBX1loss-of-function mutation causes isolated conotruncal heart defects in Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics201415:78

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-78

Received: 12 March 2014

Accepted: 24 June 2014

Published: 6 July 2014



TBX1 and CRKL haploinsufficiency is thought to cause the cardiac phenotype of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. However, few unequivocal mutations of TBX1 and CRKL have been discovered in isolated conotrucal heart defects (CTDs) patients. The aim of the study was to screen the mutation of TBX1 and CRKL in isolated CTDs Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion and identify the pathomechanism of the missense mutations.


We enrolled 199 non-22q11.2 deletion patients with CTDs and 139 unrelated healthy controls. Gene sequencing were performed for all of them. The functional data of mutations were obtained by in vitro transfection and luciferase experiments and computer modelling.


Screening of the TBX1 coding sequence identified a de novo missense mutation (c.385G → A; p.E129K) and a known polymorphism (c.928G → A; p.G310S). In vitro experiments demonstrate that the TBX1E129K variant almost lost transactivation activity. The TBX1G310S variant seems to affect the interaction of TBX1 with other factors. Computer molecular dynamics simulations showed the de novo missense mutation is likely to affect TBX1-DNA interaction. No mutation of CRKL gene was found.


These observations suggest that the TBX1 loss-of-function mutation may be involved in the pathogenesis of isolated CTDs. This is the first human missense mutation showing that TBX1 is a candidate causing isolated CTDs in Chinese patients without 22q11.2 deletion.


TBX1 haploinsufficiency 22q11.2 deletion Conotruncal heart defects Molecular dynamics simulation


Congenital heart defects (CHDs), consisting of heterogeneous anatomy with distinct phenotypic subtypes, are the most common human birth defects worldwide, affecting nearly 0.8% of live births. Of these cases, 15 ~ 20% are CTDs [1]. CTDs are severe malformations associated with cyanosis and many other serious manifestations of hypoxia and are characterised by a disordered orchestration of the ventricle, the aorta and the pulmonary artery. They include tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), double outlet of right ventricle (DORV), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (PA/VSD), transposition of the great arteries (TGA), interrupted aortic arch (IAA), and persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA), leading to cardiac enlargement, ventricular dysfunction, poor quality of life, and even sudden death in the absence of surgical treatment.

The pathogenesis of CTDs is heterogeneous and involves multiple genes and environmental factors. Although our understanding of molecular pathways in cardiac development has grown remarkably in the past few years, the aetiology of human CHDs cannot be identified or explained in the majority of cases [2]. Caused by a heterozygous multi-gene deletion, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a relatively common genetic disorder (1:4000 live births). CTDs are a prominent part of the 22q11DS phenotype, with a frequency of approximately 75% in 22q11DS patients. Reports originating from Western countries associate 12.8-17.8% of CTDs to the del22q11, and our own work showed a lower incidence (6.13%) in Chinese CTDs patients [3]. The TBX1 gene, a member of a phylogenetically conserved T-box gene family of DNA-binding transcription factors, is mapped to the 22q11.2, and is hypothesised to be responsible for the cardiac phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Mutations of the TBX1 gene have been detected in some patients featuring DGS/VCFS who are otherwise devoid of the 22q11.2 deletion [4]. Mutational analysis in nonsyndromic CTDs patients only detected a insertion of 30 bp within exon 9c of TBX1, caused polyalanine stretches [5, 6]. To better address the issue of the link between TBX1 and isolated CTDs, we performed TBX1 gene sequencing in a large sample of Chinese isolated CTDs patients without 22q11.2 deletion.

CRKL(CRK-Like), another gene located within the 22q11.2 and expressed in the developing heart, was found to be deleted in a few CTDs patients with atypical distal 22q11.2 deletions not including TBX1 [7, 8]. The Crkl -/- mice embryos had DORV, VSD [9, 10]. Crkl and Tbx1 genetically interact, and developmental defects associated with loss of Crkl and Tbx1 were linked to two major signalling pathways (RA and Fgf8) during embryonic development in model organisms [10, 11]. These lines of evidence led us to hypothesize that mutations of CRKL may also be implicated in the pathogenesis of human CTDs. To test this hypothesis, we sequenced the exons and the flanking areas of CRKL gene in all CTDs patients in our cohort.


Ethics statement

All the assessments were performed with the approval of the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Children’s Medical Centre (SCMC) and the Medical Ethics Committee of Xinhua hospital. All written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each patient and control.


The patients were recruited prospectively in SCMC from June 2008 to December 2009. The cardiac phenotype was confirmed by angiocardiography and echocardiography in all the patients. When available, the surgical operative notes were reviewed. Of 212 CTDs patients, 199 (78 female, 121 male; median age 2.1 years) were enrolled because they were negative for the 22q11.2 microdeletion when tested by MLPA using the SALSA P250-A1 MLPA-DiGeorge syndrome test kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [3]. They included 70 TOF, 50 DORV, 28 PA/VSD, 28 TGA, 4 IAA and 2 PTA patients, as well as 17 other cases of conotruncal malformations (11 single ventricle with malposition of great arteries (SV/MGA), 4 hypoplastic right heart syndrome (HDHS), 2 coarctation of aorta (CoA)). The clinical information of 199 patients was examined by trained clinicians and none of them had extracardiac anomalies and features suggestive of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. All of the subjects were of Han ethnicity. Parental informed consent was obtained for all of the patients enrolled before blood samples were drawn at the time of catheterisation. A total of 139 unrelated Han Chinese children (57 female, 83 male; median age 7.43 years; all physically and mentally healthy) were included as normal controls. We detected the cardiac morphology of these controls by transthoracic echocardiography and confirmed they were normal. After obtaining informed written parental consent, a peripheral venous blood sample was obtained, and the genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral lymphocytes using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany).


The coding regions of the three alternative spliced forms of the TBX1A, TBX1B, TBX1C (Figure 1A) and CRKL were sequenced in the 199 CTDs patients and 139 controls. We designed primers that amplify all exons and flanking intronic sequences. The primers (Table 1) were designed following the corresponding genomic regions available in the Genbank database (TBX1, NG_009229.10; CRKL, NG_016354.1) using Primers3 software ( The PCR was performed with the genomic DNA and the products were sequencing on an ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequence traces were aligned with the reference sequence using the GenBank BLAST program (
Figure 1

The screening results of the TBX1 coding sequence. (A) Schematic representation of the TBX1 gene. The conserved T-box domain is marked with yellow squares and spans exons 3-7. The two variants described in this paper are indicated by black arrows. (B) Shown at the left are the DNA sequences of the 385G → A mutation (upper panel) and the wild-type TBX1 sequence (lower panel). The fragment was sequenced from forward and reverse directions. Shown at the right is the homologues sequence alignment of a part of the T-box domain of TBX1 from various vertebrates. (C) Shown on the left are the DNA sequences of the TBX1 gene with a 928G → A change. The three electropherograms show the homozygote AA, heterozygote GA, and homozygote GG. The homologues sequence alignment is shown at the right. The conserved amino acids are shown with a grey background, and residue 129 and 310 is indicated with a black box.

Table 1

Primer sequences used to amplify and sequence all the coding exons of the TBX1 and CRKL gene and exon/intron boundaries




Fragment size




594 bp






725 bp






628 bp






414 bp






457 bp






404 bp






722 bp






775 bp






853 bp






636 bp






632 bp






747 bp






434 bp






677 bp






376 bp





Plasmid constructs

The TBX1 expression vector containing the cDNA of human TBX1C was purchased from Origene (Rockville, MD, USA). The TBX1 cDNA was digested and inserted into the plasmid pcDNA3.1(+) at the KpnI and XhoI sites. The mutant expression vectors were generated by use of site-directed mutagenesis performed according to the protocol provided by the Quickchange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, USA), and the wild-type pcDNA3.1-TBX1 was used as the template.

Four conserved T-half sites “ATTTCACACCT” were oriented head to tail, similar to those reported by Sinha et al.[12] and were synthesised and subcloned into the KpnI − HindIII sites in the pGL4.25 [luc2CP/minP] plasmid (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) to generate the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct (Figure 2A). The sequence and orientation of the luciferase reporter were verified by DNA sequencing.
Figure 2

Transcriptional activation of luciferase reporter constructs by the wild-type and mutant TBX1. (A) Schematic diagram of 4XT/2-minP reporter construct. Four conserved T-half sites “ATTTCACACCT” were oriented head to tail, synthesised and subcloned into the KpnI − HindIII sites in the pGL4.25 [luc2CP/minP] plasmid. (B) and (C) show that the 293 T or COS7 cells were co-transfected with the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct containing the T-box binding elements and either a pcDNA3.1 (+) control vector (Blank), the TBX1 wild-type construct, or the mutant constructs. The results were normalized for transfection efficiency to a co-transfected renilla luciferase vector and are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Transfection and Luciferase assays

The transient transfection was performed with FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for adherent cells. The HEK293T and COS7 cells were maintained in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, California, USA) with 10% foetal calf serum (Invitrogen, California, USA) and were then co-transfected with 100 ng of the wild-type or mutant TBX1 constructs, 500 ng of the 4XT/2-minP reporter construct, and a renilla luciferase pGL4.74 [hRluc/TK] vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The cells were harvested 40 h after transfection. The firefly and renilla luciferase activity were measured using the Dual Luciferase Kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and the Centro XS3 LB 960 Microplate Luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The activity of the firefly luciferase was normalised to that of renilla luciferase. The results shown are the mean ± s.e.m of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of wild-type and mutant TBX1

Based on the X-ray crystal structures (PDB entry: 4A04, resolution 2.1 Å) [13], the models of TBX1 and its mutant for the MD simulations were built in Sybyl version 6.8 (Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO). First, the sidechains with missing coordinates were reconstructed using the fragment library of the Biopolymer module; then the modified structures were subjected to energy minimization in the Minimize module using the Powell method up to the gradient tolerance of 0.05 kcal/(mol · Å) to relieve possible steric clashes and overlaps of side chains. The 3D structural model of the mutant TBX1 was built up using the xLeap module in the AMBER suite (version 8.0) [14].

MD simulations were conducted on the two systems of wild-type and mutant TBX1 using the AMBER suite of programs (version 8.0) with the parm99 force field [15]. Each structure was prepared by using the xLeap module in AMBER, in which protons were added to the structure and all inoizable side-chains were maintained in their standard protonation states at pH7.0. A truncated octahedral box of TIP3P waters was added with a 10 Å buffer around the complex and counterions were added to maintain the electroneutrality of the two systems. To avoid the instability that might occur during the MD simulations, the solvated systems were subjected to minimization for 5000 cycles with protein restrained and followed by another 5000 cycles with the whole systems relaxed. Then, the systems were gradually heated from 0 K to 300 K during the first 60 ps by three intervals, followed by equilibrium for 80 ps under constant volume and temperature condition. Afterwards, the systems were switched to constant pressure and temperature condition and equilibrated for 100 ps to adjust the systems to a correct density. Finally, the production simulations were carried out in the absence of any restraint and two 5-ns MD simulations were then conducted on the wild-type and mutant TBX1 to probe the function of the mutation.

All the MD simulations were performed using the parallel version of PMEMD in the AMBER suite. The long-range electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald method, whereas the SHAKE algorithm was employed to fix the lengths of the bonds involving hydrogen atoms [16, 17]. During the simulations, the integration time step of 2 fs was adopted and structural snapshots were flushed every 500 steps (1 ps). The non-bonded cut-off was set to 10.0 Å, and the non-bonded pair list was updated every 25 steps. By applying the Berendsen algorithm, each production simulation was coupled to a 300 K thermal bath at 1.0 atm pressure [18]. The temperature and pressure coupling constants were set to 2.0 ps and 1.0 ps, respectively [14].


Mutation screening of the TBX1 and CRKLgene in CTDs patients without 22q11.2 deletion

Screening of the TBX1 coding sequence identified a de novo variant, as well as one known polymorphism G310S (Figure 1). The de novo mutation is localised in exon 3 (c.385G → A; p.E129K) in heterozygosis (Figure 1B). The patient was a 12 years old boy at the time of initial admission to SCMC and suffered from PA/VSD and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). His height was 152 cm, and weight 50 kg on admission. His appearance looked normal. He didn’t show mental retardation. Due to cardiac problem, he did not finish primary school. Unfortunately he lost the opportunity to operation because of pulmonary hypertension and died at the age of 13. His parents are non-consanguineous marriage. The mutation was not observed in both of his normal parents. The E129K mutation, involving conversion from an acidic amino acid residue (Glu) to an alkaline amino acid residue (Lys), occurs within the evolutionarily conserved T-box domain in the highly conserved residue found in TBX1 orthologues of human, chimpanzee, rat, mouse, cattle, chicken, Xenopus, and Danio rerio (Figure 1B).We also detected a homozygous single nucleotide polymorphism c.928G → A; p.G310S in one male patient with HDHS, TA, VSD, TGA, pulmonary stenosis (PS), and atrial septal defect (ASD). His parents, who were verified to be carriers of heterozygosis, had no cardiac phenotype. The heterozygous variant was detected in 15 CTDs patients and seven normal controls. The G310S is located near the C-terminal of the T-box domain and conserved in the TBX1 vertebrate orthologues of humans, chimpanzees, rats, mice, Xenopus, and Danio rerios, but not in cattle and chickens (Figure 1C).

We sequenced PCR products containing coding exons from CRKL using the sanger method, and no mutations were detected.

Functional analysis of the mutations

To examine further the functional significance of the detected mutations in TBX1, we engineered the c.385G → A (p.E129K) mutation in the human TBX1 cDNA. The non-synonymous SNP c.928G → A (p.G310S) was constructed simultaneously. The polymorphism G310S showed no significant effect on the transcriptional activation in our assay, in contrast to the wild-type TBX1. It exhibited a slight decrease in transactivation relative to the wild-type in the 293 T cell line, yet a slight increase in transactivation in the COS7 cell line. The novel missense mutation E129K showed significantly reduced transcriptional activity in the 293 T and COS7 cells lines in our assay compared with the wild-type protein (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B and 2C).

Molecular models and MD simulations of wild-type and mutant TBX1

To interpret the effect of the point mutation E129K on the TBX1 function, we modelled the structure of the TBX1 DNA binding domain on the basis of the TBX1 DNA crystal structure (PDB code 4A04) using Sybyl version 6.8 (Tripos Inc. St. Louis. MO) and the structural model of TBX1E129K using the xLeap module in the AMBER suite (version 8.0). Residue glutamic acid 129 (E129) is an evolutionarily conserved residue within the T-box domain (Figure 3). It is clear from the structure that E129, which sits on a beta strand, interacts with tryptophan 179 (W179), glutamine 277 (Q277) and lysine 285 (K285) by forming hydrogen bonds (Figure 4C). Q277 and K285 are located at the helix-turn-helix motif on the C-terminal of the protein, which is involved in recognising the DNA through its minor groove [15]. The terminal negative charges of the side-chain in the E129 acidic residue are replaced with positive charges (K129, alkaline) in the mutant E129K-TBX1 (Figure 4A and B), leading to a complete disruption of the hydrogen bonds between E129 and its surrounding residues (Figure 4C and D) and a distortion of the binding interface between the TBX1 and DNA (Figure 4B), which may have a negative effect on the protein-DNA interaction and thus the associated transcriptional activation/inhibition functions.
Figure 3

The phylogenetic sequence alignment of the T-box domain and 20 additional amino acids from different species located at the N and C terminus of the T-box domain. The phylogenetic analysis is from vertebrate mammals to marine zooplankton. The aminoacid residues that are identical to the TBX1 sequences are shaded. The red pentagram demonstrates the amino acid substitutions of E129K and G310S in the TBX1 found in patients. The dotted line indicated the T-box domain.
Figure 4

Schematic diagram of TBX1 bound to DNA. (A) The wild type TBX1 structure with E129 is shown as sticks. (B) The superimposed structures between the wild-type TBX1 (cyan) and the TBX1E129K (grey) and the carbon atoms from E129 and its mutant K129 are colored in green and yellow, respectively, and the conformations are extracted from the end of the 5-ns simulations. (C) Local interactions with E129 in the wild-type TBX1. (D) Local interactions with K129 in the mutant TBX1. The hydrogen bonds around E129/K129 are shown as dashed lines.


The TBX1 gene is a member of the T-box gene family of transcription factors that is characterised by a conserved DNA binding domain throughout the metazoan evolution [19]. The members of the T-box gene family play a crucial role in a wide variety of developmental processes in vertebrate and invertebrate embryos [20]. The biological importance of these genes is emphasised by the phenotypes of the patient carried loss-of-function mutations of TBX3 and TBX5[2123].

TBX1 haploinsufficiency has long been known to be crucial in the aetiology of 22q11DS. Mutation analysis has revealed frameshift and missense mutations of TBX1 in patients with the 22q11DS-phenotype, but no detectable deletion [4, 24, 25]. Animal model experimental evidence suggests that Tbx1 is required for normal heart development [26, 27]; however, no unequivocal mutation of TBX1 has been discovered in isolated CTDs patients. Tbx1 is expressed in the secondary heart field (SHF) and positively regulates SHF cell proliferation and contribution to the muscle layer of outflow tract (OFT), of which the myocardium derives from the SHF [2830]. We investigated a cohort of isolated CTD patients without 22q11.2 deletion and identified one novel mutation (E129K) of TBX1. E129K, located within the conserved T domain, is predicted to affect TBX1-DNA interaction on the basis of the structures of DNA-bound wild-type or mutant TBX1 (Figure 3). This finding is in line with the experimental data showing that in our transient transfection and luciferase reporter assays, the TBX1E129K variant has almost lost transactivation activity for the transcription directed from the consensus palindromic DNA-binding site (Figure 2B and C).

The T-box genes are exquisitely dose-sensitive and often act in a combinatorial or hierarchical fashion [26, 31]. The T-box domain, as the basic characteristic of the T-box family, is a DNA-binding region and a protein-protein interaction domain for other transcription factors, chromatin remodelling complexes and histone-modifying enzymes [31]. It has been suggested that Tbx1 interacts with the BAF chromatin remodelling complex and histone methylases to regulate transcription [32]. The known variant, G310S, positioned in a conserved region downstream to the T-box domain, was found in our CTDs patients and healthy controls. The TBX1G310S variant exhibits opposite behaviour in the 293 T and COS7 cell lines. In the 293 T cell line, the variant partially loses the transactivation on reporter with the conserved half-T sites (Figure 2B), whereas it slightly enhances the transactivation in the COS7 cell line (Figure 2C). Prior studies have reported that the TBX1G310S variant prevents TBX1-SMAD1 interaction that could not affect by the mutations that abolish transactivation [33]. We hypothesise that there may be a critical region for protein-protein interaction that resides downstream to the T-box region, and the different behaviour of the TBX1G310S mutant in the 293 T and COS7 cell lines may be caused by the distinct cofactors for TBX1 function in those cells. Although the heterozygous variant was found in the patients and controls, the homozygote was only detected in a patient with complex CHD. We cannot exclude that the TBX1G310S mutant protein might have an effect on the pathogenesis of congenital malformations.

CRKL gene lies within the typically 3 Mb deleted region in 22q11DS patients. CRKL encodes an SH2-SH3-SH3 adaptor protein, and is part of a signalling pathway that includes Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and MAP kinases (ERK1 and ERK2) [34]. The embryonic phenotypes of murine neural crest conditional knockout of Fak or Crkl are similar and show cardiac outflow tract abnormalities [10, 11, 34]. These experimental observations indicate that the Fak-Crkl-Erk signalling pathway is critical important for cardiac outflow tract development. However, only four patients with CTDs have been reported with atypical distal 22q11.2 deletion that involves CRKL, but not TBX1 so far [8]. Sequencing analysis of the alleles or the remaining allele failed to identify a CRKL mutation [8, 35]. In our study, CRKL was sequenced in 199 CTDs patients without extracardiac anomalies, and we also failed to detect a mutation. We therefore speculate that the coding region mutation of CRKL gene may not implicated in the pathogenesis of CTDs.

We recognize some weaknesses that are inherent to our study. We only sequenced the coding region and flanking areas between exons and introns. In genome, non-coding regions (promoter regions and regulatory elements) play an important role on gene expression. Further studies are needed to be carried out to clarify the link between variants in non-coding regions and the pathogenesis of CTDs.


We have demonstrated that a novel TBX1 nucleotide sequence variant is a mutation that might be involved in the pathogenesis of isolated CTDs in non-22q11.2 deletion patients, based on the results of sequence alignment and functional analysis of the mutants. The novel TBX1E129K mutant, hypothesised to have loss-of-function status, may cause heart defects by haploinsufficiency. Other than the E129K mutation, the known TBX1G310S variant seems to affect the interaction of TBX1 with other factors.




We thank Long Fei, Wang Lirong, Pu Tian, Wang Xike for their excellent technical assistance, Li Wenjuan and Cao Ruixue for their critical reading of the manuscript. We also appreciated the patients whose participation made this study possible.


The project was funded by a grant (2010CB529501) from the National Basic Research Program of China, the grants (81070135/H0204, 81300068/H0201, 81270233/H0204) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the major key project for fundamental research (Grant No. 13JC1401705) from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee, the grant from Shanghai university top discipline B constructions program, and the program for Innovative Research Team of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission: Paediatrics.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Xinhua hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Medical Laboratory, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Scientific Research Center, Xinhua hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine


  1. Conti E, Grifone N, Sarkozy A, Tandoi C, Marino B, Digilio MC, Mingarelli R, Pizzuti A, Dallapiccola B: DiGeroge subtypes of nonsyndromic conotruncal defects: evidence against a major role of TBX1 gene. Eur J Hum Genetic. 2003, 11: 349-351.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tomita-Mitchell A, Mahnke DK, Struble CA, Tuffnell ME, Stamm KD, Hidestrand M, Harris SE, Goetsch MA, Simpson PM, Bick DP, Broechel U, Pelech AN, Twddell JS, Mitchell ME: Human gene copy number spectra analysis in congenital heart malformations. Physil Genomics. 2012, 44: 518-541.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu YJ, Wang J, Xu R, Zhao PJ, Wang XK, Sun HJ, Bao LM, Shen J, Fu QH, Sun K: Detecting 22q11.2 deletion in Chinese children with conotruncal heart defects and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the haploid TBX1 locus. BMC Med Genet. 2011, 12: 169-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Yagi H, Furutani Y, Hamada H, Sasaki T, Asakawa S, Minoshima S, Ichida F, Joo K, Kimura M, Imamura S, Kamatani N, Momma K, Takao A, Nakazawa M, Shimizu N, Matsuoka R: Role of TBX1 in human del22q11.2 syndrome. Lancet. 2003, 362: 1366-1373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rauch R, Hofbeck M, Zweier C, Koch A, Zink S, Trautmann U, Hoyer J, Kaulitz R, Singer H, Rauch A: Comprehensive genotype-phenotype analysis in 230 patients with tetralogy of Fallot. J Med Genet. 2010, 47: 321-331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gong W, Gottlieb S, Collins J, Blescia A, Dietz H, Goldmuntz E, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Emanuel BS, Driscoll DA, Budarf ML: Mutation analysis of TBX1 in non-deleted patients with features of DGS/VCFS or isolated cardiovascular defects. J Med Genet. 2001, 38: E45-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Verhagen JM, Diderich KE, Oudesluijs G, Mancini GM, Eqqink AJ, Verkleij-Hagoort AC, Groenenberg IA, Willems PJ, du Plessis FA, de Man SA, Srebniak MI, van Opstal D, Hulsman LO, van Zutven LJ, Wessels MW: Phenotypic variability of atypical 22q11.2 deletions not including TBX1. Am J Med Genet A. 2012, 10 (158(A)): 2412-2420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Osoegawa K, Iovannisci DM, Lin B, Parodi C, Schultz K, Shaw GM, Lammer EJ: Identification of novel candidate gene loci and increased sex chromosome aneuploidy among infants with conotruncal heart defects. Am J Med Genet A. 2014, 164A: 97-406.Google Scholar
  9. Guris DL, Fantes J, Tara D, Druker BJ, Imamoto A: Mice lacking the homologue of the human 22q11.2 gene CRKL phenocopy nuerocristopathies of DiGeorge syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001, 27 (3): 293-298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moon AM, Guris DL, Seo JH, Hammond J, Talbot A, Imanoto A: Crkl deficiency disrupts Fgf8 signaling in a mouse model of 22q11 deletion syndromes. Dev Cell. 2006, 10: 71-80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Guris DL, Duester G, Papaioannou VE, Imamoto A: Dose-dependent interaction of Tbx1 and Crkl and locally aberrant RA signaling in a model of del22q11 syndrome. Dev Cell. 2006, 10: 81-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sinha S, Abraham S, Gronostajski RM, Campbell CE: Differential DNA binding and transcription modulation by three T-box proteins, T, TBX1 and TBX2. Gene. 2000, 258: 15-29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Omari KE, Mesmaeker JD, Karia D, Ginn H, Bhattacharya S, Mancini EJ: Structure of the DNA-bound T-box domain of human TBX1, a transcription factor associated with the DiGeorge syndrome. Proteins. 2012, 80: 655-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang J, Yan J, Zhang J, Zhu SG, Wang YL, Shi T, Zhu CH, Chen C, Liu X, Cheng JK, Mustelin T, Feng GS, Chen GQ, Yu JX: SUMO1 modification of PTEN regulates tumorigenesis by controlling its association with the plasma membrane. Nat Commun. 2012, 3: 911-doi:10.1038/ncomms1919View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA: How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules?. J Comput Chem. 2000, 21: 1049-1074.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rychaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC: Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comp Phys. 1977, 23: 327-341.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA: SERRLE An analysis version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithms for rigid water models. J Comput Chem. 1992, 13: 952-962.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR: Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984, 81: 3684-3690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Papaioannou VE, Silver LM: The T-box gene family. BioEsssays. 1998, 20: 9-19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith J: T-box genes: what they do and how they do it. Trend Genet. 1999, 15: 154-158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bamshad M, Lin RC, Law DJ, Watkins WC, Krakowiak PA, Moore ME, Franceschini P, Lala R, Holmes LB, Gebuhr TC, Bruneau BG, Schinzel A, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Jorde LB: Mutations in human TBX3 alter limb, apocrine and genital development in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997, 16: 311-315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meneghini V, Odent S, Platonova N, Egeo A, Merlo GR: Noval TBX3 mutation data in families with Ulnar-Mammary syndrome indicate a genotype-phenotype relationship: mutations that do not disrupt the T-domain are associated with less severe limb defects. Eur J Med Genet. 2006, 49: 151-158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mori AD, Bruneau BG: TBX5 mutations and congenital heart disease: Holt-Oram syndrome revealed. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004, 19: 211-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paylor R, Glaser B, Mupo A, Ataliotis P, Spencer C, Sobotka A, Sparks C, Choi CH, Oghalai J, Curran S, Murphy KC, Monks S, Williams N, O’Donovan MC, Owen MJ, Scambler PJ, Lindsay E: Tbx1 haploinsufficiency is linked to behavioral disorders in mice and humans: implications for 22q11 deletion syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 7729-7734.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Torres-Juan L, Rosell J, Morla M, Vidal-Pou C, Garcia-Algas F, de la Fuente MA, Juan M, Tuban A, Bachiller D, Bemues M, Perez-Granero A, Govea N, Busquets X, Heine-Suner D: Mutations in TBX1 genocopy the 22q11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes: a new susceptibility factor for mental retardation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007, 15: 658-663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Choudhry P, Trede NS: DiGeorge syndrome gene tbx1 functions through wnt11r to regulate heart looping and differentiation. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e58145-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Scambler PJ: 22q11 deletion syndrome: a role for TBX1 in pharyngeal and cardiovascular development. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010, 31: 378-390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Buckingham M, Meilhac S, Zaffran S: Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6: 826-835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen L, Fulcoli FG, Tang S, Baldini A: Tbx1 regulates proliferation and differentiation of multipotent heart progenitors. Circ Res. 2009, 105: 842-851.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Liao J, Aggarwal VS, Nowotschin S, Bondarev A, Lipner S, Morrow BE: Identification of downstream genetic pathways of Tbx1 in the secondary heart field. Dev Biol. 2008, 316: 524-537.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Greulich F, Rudat C, Kispert A: Mechanisms of T-box gene function in the developing heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2011, 91: 212-222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen L, Fulcoli FG, Ferrentino R, Martucciello S, Illingworth EA, Baldini A: Transcriptional control in cardiac progenitors: Tbx1 interacts with the BAF chromatin remodeling complex and regulates Wnt5a. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8: e1002571-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fulcoli FG, Huynh T, Scambler PJ, Baldini A: TBX1 regulates the BMP-Smad1 pathway in a transcription independent manner. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6049-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Vallejo-Illarramendi A, Zang K, Reichardt LF: Focal adhesion kinase is required for neural crest cell morphogenesis during mouse cardiovascular development. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 2218-2230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao W, Niu G, Shen B, Zheng Y, Gong F, Wang X, Lee J, Mulvihill JJ, Chen X, Li S: High-resolution analysis of copy number variants in adults with simple-to-moderate congenital heart disease. Am J Med Genet A. 2013, 161A: 3087-3094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.