Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Targeted genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia using next generation sequencing: a population-based study

  • Penny J Norsworthy1,
  • Jana Vandrovcova1,
  • Ellen RA Thomas1,
  • Archie Campbell2,
  • Shona M Kerr2,
  • Jennifer Biggs1,
  • Laurence Game1,
  • Anne K Soutar1,
  • Blair H Smith3,
  • Anna F Dominiczak4,
  • David J Porteous2,
  • Andrew D Morris3,
  • Generation Scotland5 and
  • Timothy J Aitman1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics201415:70

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-70

Received: 4 March 2014

Accepted: 28 May 2014

Published: 23 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common Mendelian condition which, untreated, results in premature coronary heart disease. An estimated 88% of FH cases are undiagnosed in the UK. We previously validated a method for FH mutation detection in a lipid clinic population using next generation sequencing (NGS), but this did not address the challenge of identifying index cases in primary care where most undiagnosed patients receive healthcare. Here, we evaluate the targeted use of NGS as a potential route to diagnosis of FH in a primary care population subset selected for hypercholesterolaemia.

Methods

We used microfluidics-based PCR amplification coupled with NGS and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect mutations in LDLR, APOB and PCSK9 in three phenotypic groups within the Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study including 193 individuals with high total cholesterol, 232 with moderately high total cholesterol despite cholesterol-lowering therapy, and 192 normocholesterolaemic controls.

Results

Pathogenic mutations were found in 2.1% of hypercholesterolaemic individuals, in 2.2% of subjects on cholesterol-lowering therapy and in 42% of their available first-degree relatives. In addition, variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUCS) were detected in 1.4% of the hypercholesterolaemic and cholesterol-lowering therapy groups. No pathogenic variants or VUCS were detected in controls.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that population-based genetic testing using these protocols is able to deliver definitive molecular diagnoses of FH in individuals with high cholesterol or on cholesterol-lowering therapy. The lower cost and labour associated with NGS-based testing may increase the attractiveness of a population-based approach to FH detection compared to genetic testing with conventional sequencing. This could provide one route to increasing the present low percentage of FH cases with a genetic diagnosis.

Keywords

Familial hypercholesterolaemia Total cholesterol LDLR Molecular diagnostic testing Next-generation sequencing Primary care Generation Scotland

Background

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH, OMIM no.143890) is a common autosomal dominant disorder characterised by raised serum cholesterol, increased arterial deposition of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and high risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Clinical diagnosis is based on the presence of raised total or LDL-cholesterol, tendon xanthomata, corneal arcus, family history and the presence of FH-causing mutations in the LDLR, PCSK9 or APOB genes [1]. The prevalence of FH is estimated to be between 1/200 and 1/500 [2, 3], and while most of the excess risk of premature CHD can be averted by cholesterol lowering drugs, currently only 12-25% of cases in the UK, and <1% in the USA are believed to have a molecular diagnosis [3, 4].

Genetic testing and family cascade screening has been proposed as the most cost-effective strategy for detecting cases of FH [3, 5], and for distinguishing monogenic FH from sporadic or polygenic hypercholesterolaemia [6]. This strategy was adopted in the 2008 UK guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [7]. However, implementation of these guidelines in England has been limited due to poor availability, low throughput and high costs of traditional genetic testing, fragmented service delivery and lack of investment in identification of index cases.

We previously demonstrated that next generation sequencing (NGS) is suitable for FH mutation detection in patients attending lipid clinics, with similar sensitivity and specificity to conventional capillary sequencing [8]. Moreover, NGS mutation detection is suited to high-throughput testing of large numbers of samples, which is not so readily achievable with standard capillary sequencing platforms. Since the majority of undiagnosed FH patients receive their healthcare outside lipid clinics, we sought to assess the feasibility of targeted sequence-based genetic testing for FH in a primary care-based population subset selected for hypercholesterolaemia.

Methods

DNA samples

The Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS) is a repository of anonymised biological samples and accompanying clinical, biochemical and family data from 23,960 Scottish residents [9]. The ability to recruit at least one first-degree relative was a condition for participation in the GS:SFHS, and therefore around two thirds of those taking part are consenting adult relatives of recruits and volunteers.

We selected a subset of GS:SFHS subjects for genetic analysis using criteria designed to enrich the test population for individuals likely to have FH, based on previously reported population total cholesterol data in FH [10, 11], and using additional age and body mass index (BMI) thresholds to reduce inclusion of age- and obesity-related cases of hyperlipidaemia (Figure 1). Triglyceride levels were not measured in the Generation Scotland cohort and therefore data for LDL-cholesterol were not available. Subjects were consequently selected for study on the basis of total cholesterol data. In total, 617 unrelated subjects were obtained from the GS:SFHS and passed quality control (QC; see below) for NGS and MLPA: 193 individuals with raised total cholesterol (designated high cholesterol group), 232 individuals with moderately high total cholesterol despite cholesterol-lowering therapy (cholesterol-therapy group) and 192 normocholesterolaemic controls. The control group, also from the GS:SFHS study, were selected to be closest to the population specific mean total cholesterol level, and were age, sex and BMI matched to the high cholesterol group (Table 1 and Figure 1). Total cholesterol cut-off thresholds for each study group are defined in Figure 1. Of all study subjects, 84.1% were White Scottish, 8.6% other Caucasians, 2.0% mixed race and other ethnic groups, and 5.3% unknown ethnicity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-15-70/MediaObjects/12881_2014_Article_1217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Selection criteria for GS:SFHS high cholesterol, cholesterol-therapy and control groups. Groups of subjects selected for the study are shaded. The number of unrelated participants studied in each category of total cholesterol level, age and body mass index is shown. Numbers in parentheses denote the total number of participants in the entire GS:SFHS cohort within each study group. TC: Total cholesterol.

Table 1

Characteristics of Generation Scotland groups studied

Group

Age

Sex distribution %M: %F

BMI

Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

High cholesterol (n = 193)

44 (21–88)

41/59

26.9 (18.7-47.4)

8.1 (7.0-12.0)

Control (n = 192)

45 (21–84)

42/58

26.4 (14.2-44.6)

5.2 (5.0-5.3)

Cholesterol-therapy (n = 232)

60 (30–88)

43/57

28.1 (18.1-56.6)

5.9 (5.5-9.5)

Median data are given for age, BMI and total cholesterol. Ranges are shown in brackets.

Demographic data of the study population is summarised in Table 1. The median age of the cholesterol-therapy group was higher than the high cholesterol and control groups reflecting higher cholesterol-lowering drug prescription rates in older subjects in this primary care population. 40% of these individuals were known to be taking statins, while the remainder were on unspecified cholesterol lowering medication. Study subjects in the cholesterol-therapy group were selected from those with total cholesterol ≥5.5 mmol/l, these being unlikely to have achieved lipid-lowering therapy targets for FH [12]. DNA samples for available first-degree relatives of index cases who tested positive for FH mutations were obtained from the GS:SFHS repository, and were tested by Sanger sequencing for mutations detected in their respective proband relatives. Ethical approval for the GS:SFHS study was obtained from the Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics (on behalf of the National Health Service). All patients provided informed consent for the use of their data and samples for medical research.

Mutation detection

The full LDLR coding sequence, all four exons known to harbour FH mutations in PCSK9, and the known mutation hot spot in APOB were amplified using the 48.48 Access Array (Fluidigm, San Francisco, USA) and pooled samples sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, USA) as described [8]. Due to the very low likelihood of detecting mutations that could be definitively shown to be pathogenic in the remainder of the PCSK9 and APOB genes, it was considered that inclusion of these regions in the assay would not be informative and these regions were therefore not included in the assay. In addition, because of the low frequency of known mutations outside coding regions or splice sites, intronic regions outside splice sites were not covered in this assay.

DNA sequences were considered to have passed QC if >90% of all nucleotides were covered at ≥15x and >98% of LDLR coding regions were covered at ≥15×. Mean coverage for all DNA samples passing QC across all amplicons was 2023× with a mean of 95.2% of bases covered at least 15×. Although this level of coverage falls below recent recommendations for clinical grade sequencing [13], our group established high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (100%) for this NGS-assay at comparable levels of coverage in a lipid clinic population [8]. Recent advances in MiSeq sequencing protocols and further assay optimisation would, however, allow further development that could lead to levels of coverage that meet present recommendations.

The presence of large insertions/deletions was detected using the MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) LDLR-P062 kit (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) following the manufacturer’s protocol including recommendations for QC.

Variant analysis

DNA sequences were mapped to the human GRCh37 reference assembly and variant calls generated and annotated as described [8]. Variants with minor allele frequency reported at greater than 1% in Ensembl [14], and intronic variants outside exon-intron boundaries were considered non-pathogenic and were excluded from further analysis. Remaining variants were compared to an FH locus-specific database [14, 15], HGMD professional [16], and annotated in silico using Variant Effect Predictor [14] and Mutation Taster [17]. Variants described unequivocally as FH-causing in mutation databases were classified as pathogenic. All remaining known variants were classified as variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUCS) unless published data indicated that these variants are likely benign. Novel missense variants were also classified as VUCS. Novel sequence changes outside coding regions and essential splice sites, and synonymous coding changes were considered likely benign. As only 5’ and 3’ ends of introns were represented in our NGS-assay, intronic variants outside splice sites were not evaluated. All rare variants were verified by conventional Sanger sequencing and the single detected duplication was confirmed by PCR.

Results

Mutation detection

FH-causing mutations were detected in 4 out of 193 (2.1%) subjects in the high-cholesterol group and in 5 out of 232 (2.2%) subjects in the cholesterol-therapy group (Table 2). All nine mutations have been previously reported as pathogenic in FH patients [15, 16]. No FH-causing mutations were detected in the 192 subjects in the normocholesterolaemic control group.
Table 2

Pathogenic FH mutations and variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUCS) found in Generation Scotland subjects

No.

Age

Sex

Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

Group

Gene

Nucleotide change

Protein change

PolyPhen2 prediction

SIFT prediction

Mutation taster

n

Pathogenic mutations

        

1

51

F

12.0

High cholesterol

APOB

c.10580G > A

p.Arg3527Gln

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Polymorphism

1

2

44

F

8.9

LDLR

c.693C > G

p.Cys231Trp

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Disease causing

1

3

36

M

7.0

LDLR

c.268G > A

p.Asp90Asn

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Disease causing

1

4

61

F

8.3

LDLR

c.718G > A

p.Glu240Lys

Possibly damaging

Deleterious

Disease causing

1

5

56

M

5.9

Cholesterol-therapy

APOB

c.10580G > A

p.Arg3527Gln

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Polymorphism

1

6

57

M

5.7

LDLR

c.326G > A

p.Cys109Tyr

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Disease causing

1

7

50

M

5.9

LDLR

c.1133A > C

p.Gln378Pro

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Polymorphism

1

8

71

F

5.5

LDLR

c.232C > T

p.Arg78Cys

Probably damaging

Tolerated

Disease causing

1

9

60

F

6.2

LDLR

c.1586-?_1845 + ?dup

 

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

1

(Exon 11 and 12 duplication)

VUCS

          

10

32

F

7.7

High cholesterol

PCSK9

c.274G > A a

p.Glu92Lys

Benign

Tolerated

Polymorphism

1

11

31

M

8.7

LDLR

c.-121 T > C

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Polymorphism

1

12

54

F

8.2

LDLR

c.1816G > T

p.Ala606Ser

Possibly damaging

Tolerated

Disease causing

1

13

63

M

5.5

Cholesterol-therapy

LDLR

c.2294 T > G a

p.Val765Gly

Benign

Tolerated

Polymorphism

2 b

14

61

M

7.0

15

36

M

6.0

LDLR

c.2479G > A

p.Val827Ile

Probably damaging

Deleterious

Disease causing

1

n, number of individuals with variant, a All variants had been reported previously apart from c.274G > A and c.2294 T > G which were novel variants, b Not known to be related.

Five VUCS were detected in six subjects from the high-cholesterol and cholesterol-therapy groups (Table 2), but none in normocholesterolaemic controls. Three of the five detected variants have been previously reported in FH patients but their pathogenicity is unclear [8, 15]. The two missense changes, p.Glu92Lys substitution in PCSK9 and p.Val765Gly in LDLR, have not been reported before and further segregation and functional studies will be needed to clarify the pathogenicity of these variants.

Two additional rare non-synonymous coding sequence variants in LDLR were identified in three study subjects, but their previously reported presence in normocholesterolaemic individuals has led to their classification as benign variants [18]. The p.Arg744Gln variant was found in two cholesterol-treated subjects not known to be related, whose total cholesterol measurements on treatment were 7.7 mmol/l and 9.5 mmol/l. The p.Ala50Ser was found in one control subject (total cholesterol 5.3 mmol/l).

Cascade testing

DNA was available for cascade testing in relatives of six of the index cases identified here as having pathogenic mutations. From a total of twelve available first-degree relatives, five molecular diagnoses of FH were made: one from the two relatives of index case 4, three from the five relatives of index case 8, and one from the single relative of index case 9 (Table 2). In all cases mutations identified in relatives were the same as that of the associated index case. Single first-degree relatives of index cases 2 and 5, and two first-degree relatives from index case 7, were mutation negative. Cholesterol data was available for three of the five new molecular diagnoses: two of these subjects had relatively high cholesterol levels despite being on cholesterol-lowering therapy (5.0 mmol/l and 5.5 mmol/l); the third subject was untreated, with a cholesterol level of 7.7 mmol/l.

Discussion

Sequence-based detection of index cases and family cascade testing offer a possible route to diagnosis of FH in primary care, but this approach has not been evaluated to date. In this study we have used our recently validated NGS-based assay [8] and MLPA to detect FH-causing mutations in a primary care-based population in subjects who, based on readily available clinical data, were considered to have an increased risk of FH compared to the general population. In the sample of GS:SFHS patients tested, we found pathogenic, FH-causing mutations in 2.1% of unrelated high risk individuals and none in normocholesterolaemic controls. A further five FH cases were identified through cascade testing of first degree relatives of index cases by testing for the identified mutation found in each index case. We also detected VUCS in 1.4% of the high-cholesterol and cholesterol-therapy groups, but none in normocholesterolaemic controls. Further functional and segregation studies will be needed to clarify pathogenicity of these variants. The interpretation of VUCS in NGS projects remains a challenge, although given the present rapid increase in available, clinically relevant sequencing data and the expansion of disease-specific databases, we anticipate that the clinical interpretation of variants currently classified as VUCS is likely to become easier in the coming months and years.

The GS:SFHS is a primary care-based study of subjects aged 35–65 at recruitment, and their consenting adult relatives, phenotyped for a range of biochemical and morphometric parameters including body mass index, total cholesterol and history of medical prescriptions [9]. These clinical details were used to ascertain subjects who would be enriched for FH-causing mutations, but in most cases were not sufficient to apply formal clinical diagnostic criteria for FH (Simon Broome or Dutch Lipid Clinic) [19, 20]. No data was collected on clinical phenotypes such as tendon xanthomata, and while some family history information was collected, it did not include sufficient detail (for example age at onset of cardiovascular disease) to apply Simon Broome or Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria. A family history of hypercholesterolaemia could only be established for those with relatives who had been recruited to the study. In subjects from the cholesterol-therapy group, pre-treatment cholesterol measurements were not available. Although preventing clinical diagnostic criteria from being applied, this level of information is analogous to the available data in a previous UK study of FH which used casenote review without genetic testing in a primary care setting [10]. This highlights the differences in entry criteria between primary care and Lipid Clinic populations, and illustrates the importance of careful selection criteria for this approach to molecular diagnosis in primary care. Of interest, however, was that within our high cholesterol group, a subset of 50 individuals who were aged 40 or under had total cholesterol 7–7.4 mmol/l and therefore do not meet Simon Broome criteria for FH. One of this group was found to have an FH causing mutation (see below).

The mutation detection rate reported here is considerably lower than in Lipid Clinic populations tested according to defined clinical criteria [8, 21], but is higher than the detection rate in an unselected population study in Copenhagen, in which only 20% of those diagnosed clinically as having probable or definite FH (0.73% of the study population) were found by genotyping to have a common FH mutation [22]. The low FH detection rate in comparison to Lipid Clinic populations is most likely a consequence of the limited clinical data such as the absence of information on tendon xanthomata and LDL-cholesterol, as well as the probable inclusion of individuals with polygenic and lifestyle related hypercholesterolaemia which is reportedly of high prevalence in the Scottish compared to the English population [23] which may also have affected our ability to enrich this group for genetic effects. The availability of data on LDL-cholesterol and presence or absence of tendon xanthomata in future study populations, as well as genetic testing in populations with a lower background frequency of cardiovascular disease are likely to allow greater enrichment for patients with FH in those selected for testing, with a corresponding higher FH detection rate.

Treatment targets are more stringent in FH compared to sporadic hypercholesterolaemia owing to the greater vascular risk caused by lifelong high cholesterol levels [12], and therefore it is notable that the number of molecular diagnoses we made in the cholesterol-therapy group was similar to that of the high cholesterol group. Although individuals in the cholesterol-therapy group are receiving lipid-lowering medication, their relatively high cholesterol levels (5.5 – 6.2 mmol/l) suggest suboptimal treatment, which could most likely be addressed by more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy, ideally in a lipid clinic. Molecular diagnosis in these individuals would also permit cascade testing of their relatives. Consistent with the experience from the Dutch cascade screening programme [3, 24], these data illustrate the advantages of identifying FH in primary care by genetic testing in order to distinguish FH patients definitively from those with other types of hypercholesterolaemia. Making use of NGS-based techniques to identify FH cases in primary care also provides a feasible alternative to reliance on lipid clinics in countries such as England and the USA where genetic testing for FH is not generally carried out and overall diagnostic rates remain low.

The selection criteria we employed here may not detect all mutation positive FH cases in primary care. For example, Index Case 3 (Table 1; TC = 7.0 mmol/l) was on the lower cholesterol threshold for inclusion in our study. In addition, since only 13% of patients in the GS:SFHS on cholesterol-lowering therapy had total cholesterol ≥5.5 mmol/l, further testing of subjects on cholesterol-lowering therapies but with cholesterol <5.5 mmol/l would be likely to make further molecular diagnoses of FH and these would be a source of additional cases through family cascade testing.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study of FH based on DNA sequencing in a primary care population. Previous studies to detect FH in primary care populations have been based on clinical criteria alone [10, 25], or genotyping for common mutations [22]. We have evaluated the targeted use of high-throughput NGS-based methods for detection of FH cases in primary care, and demonstrated that population-based genetic testing using these protocols is able to deliver definitive molecular diagnoses of FH in high-risk individuals. Because detection of FH cases in primary care would require testing of much larger numbers of subjects than detection of cases in secondary care, the lower cost and labour associated with NGS-based testing [8, 26, 27] could increase the attractiveness of a population-based approach to FH detection compared to genetic testing with conventional sequencing. Coupled with genetic testing in lipid clinics, selective NGS-based population screening with family cascade testing could therefore be one route to increasing the present low percentage of FH cases with a genetic diagnosis. Detailed studies should now be undertaken to establish the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Notes

Abbreviations

APOB: 

Apolipoprotein B

BMI: 

Body mass index

CHD: 

Coronary heart disease

FH: 

Familial hypercholesterolaemia

GS: 

SFHS: Generation Scotland: Scottish family health study

HGMD: 

Human gene mutation database

LDL: 

Low density lipoprotein

LDLR: 

Low density lipoprotein receptor

MLPA: 

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

NGS: 

Next generation sequencing

NICE: 

National institute for health and clinical excellence

PCSK9: 

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

QC: 

Quality control

TC: 

Total cholesterol

VUCS: 

Variant of uncertain clinical significance.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Generation Scotland has received core funding from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates CZD/16/6 and the Scottish Funding Council HR03006. We also acknowledge funding from the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre and the British Heart Foundation to TJA, from a Wellcome Trust Clinical Training Fellowship to ERAT, and from the NIHR-funded Imperial Biomedical Research Centre to TJA. We are grateful to all the families who took part in the GS:SFHS, the general practitioners and the Scottish School of Primary Care for their help in recruiting them, and the whole Generation Scotland team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, healthcare assistants and nurses.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London
(2)
Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh
(3)
Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee
(4)
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow
(5)
Generation Scotland, A Collaboration between the University Medical Schools and NHS in Aberdeen

References

  1. van der Graaf A, Avis HJ, Kusters DM, Vissers MN, Hutten BA, Defesche JC, Huijgen R, Fouchier SW, Wijburg FA, Kastelein JJ, Wiegman A: Molecular basis of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia: assessment in a large cohort of hypercholesterolemic children. Circulation. 2011, 123 (11): 1167-1173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein JL, Schrott HG, Hazzard WR, Bierman EL, Motulsky AG: Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease. II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia. J Clin Invest. 1973, 52 (7): 1544-1568.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, Wiklund O, Hegele RA, Raal FJ, Defesche JC, Wiegman A, Santos RD, Watts GF, Parhofer KG, Kees Hovingh G, Kovanen PT, Boileau C, Averna M, Boren J, Bruckert E, Catapano AL, Kuivenhoven JA, Pajukanta P, Ray K, Stalenhoef AF, Stroes E, Taskinen MR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, for the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus P: Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013, 34 (45): 3478-3490.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. National Clinical Audit of the Management of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia 2010: Full Report. [http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/resources/audits/FH]
  5. Nherera L, Marks D, Minhas R, Thorogood M, Humphries SE: Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using alternative diagnostic and identification strategies. Heart. 2011, 97 (14): 1175-1181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Talmud PJ, Shah S, Whittall R, Futema M, Howard P, Cooper JA, Harrison SC, Li K, Drenos F, Karpe F, Neil HA, Descamps OS, Langenberg C, Lench N, Kivimaki M, Whittaker J, Hingorani AD, Kumari M, Humphries SE: Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case–control study. Lancet. 2013, 381 (9874): 1293-1301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wierzbicki AS, Humphries SE, Minhas R, Guideline Development G: Familial hypercholesterolaemia: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: a1095-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vandrovcova J, Thomas ER, Atanur SS, Norsworthy PJ, Neuwirth C, Tan Y, Kasperaviciute D, Biggs J, Game L, Mueller M, Soutar AK, Aitman TJ: The use of next-generation sequencing in clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Genet Med. 2013, 15 (12): 948-957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith BH, Campbell A, Linksted P, Fitzpatrick B, Jackson C, Kerr SM, Deary IJ, Macintyre DJ, Campbell H, McGilchrist M, Hocking LJ, Wisely L, Ford I, Lindsay RS, Morton R, Palmer CN, Dominiczak AF, Porteous DJ, Morris AD, Cohort Profile: Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS): The study, its participants and their potential for genetic research on health and illness. Int J Epidemiol. 2013, 42 (3): 689-700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray J, Jaiyeola A, Whiting M, Modell M, Wierzbicki AS: Identifying patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: an informatics-based approach in one primary care centre. Heart. 2008, 94 (6): 754-758.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Schumacher MC, Hegele RA, Leppert MF, Ludwig EH, Hopkins PN: Diagnosing heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using new practical criteria validated by molecular genetics. Am J Cardiol. 1993, 72 (2): 171-176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Neil A, Cooper J, Betteridge J, Capps N, McDowell I, Durrington P, Seed M, Humphries SE: Reductions in all-cause, cancer, and coronary mortality in statin-treated patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a prospective registry study. Eur Heart J. 2008, 29 (21): 2625-2633.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Berg JS, Brown KK, Deignan JL, Friez MJ, Funke BH, Hegde MR, Lyon E, Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assurance Commitee: ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2013, 15 (9): 733-747.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, Carvalho-Silva D, Clapham P, Coates G, Fitzgerald S, Gil L, Giron CG, Gordon L, Hourlier T, Hunt S, Johnson N, Juettemann T, Kahari AK, Keenan S, Kulesha E, Martin FJ, Maurel T, McLaren WM, Murphy DN, Nag R, Overduin B, Pignatelli M, Pritchard B, Pritchard E, Riat HS, et al: Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42 (1): D749-755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leigh SE, Foster AH, Whittall RA, Hubbart CS, Humphries SE: Update and analysis of the University College London low density lipoprotein receptor familial hypercholesterolemia database. Ann Hum Genet. 2008, 72 (Pt 4): 485-498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Howells K, Phillips AD, Thomas NS, Cooper DN: The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med. 2009, 1 (1): 13-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D: MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nature Methods. 2010, 7: 575-576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huijgen R, Kindt I, Fouchier SW, Defesche JC, Hutten BA, Kastelein JJ, Vissers MN: Functionality of sequence variants in the genes coding for the low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B in individuals with inherited hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 2010, 31 (6): 752-760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group: Risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ. 1991, 303 (6807): 893-896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Defesche J: Familial Hypercholesterolemi. Lipids and Vascular Disease. Edited by: Betteridge DJ. 2000, London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 65-76.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor A, Wang D, Patel K, Whittall R, Wood G, Farrer M, Neely RD, Fairgrieve S, Nair D, Barbir M, Jones JL, Egan S, Everdale R, Lolin Y, Hughes E, Cooper JA, Hadfield SG, Norbury G, Humphries SE: Mutation detection rate and spectrum in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients in the UK pilot cascade project. Clin Genet. 2010, 77 (6): 572-580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG: Familial hypercholesterolemia in the danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97 (11): 3956-3964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roth GA, Fihn SD, Mokdad AH, Aekplakorn W, Hasegawa T, Lim SS: High total serum cholesterol, medication coverage and therapeutic control: an analysis of national health examination survey data from eight countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2011, 89 (2): 92-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huijgen R, Hutten BA, Kindt I, Vissers MN, Kastelein JJ: Discriminative ability of LDL-cholesterol to identify patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a cross-sectional study in 26,406 individuals tested for genetic FH. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012, 5 (3): 354-359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Neil HA, Hammond T, Huxley R, Matthews DR, Humphries SE: Extent of underdiagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia in routine practice: prospective registry study. BMJ. 2000, 321 (7254): 148-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Lepri FR, Scavelli R, Digilio MC, Gnazzo M, Grotta S, Dentici ML, Pisaneschi E, Sirleto P, Capolino R, Baban A, Russo S, Franchin T, Angioni A, Dallapiccola B: Diagnosis of Noonan syndrome and related disorders using target next generation sequencing. BMC Med Genet. 2014, 15 (1): 14-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Ware JS, John S, Roberts AM, Buchan R, Gong S, Peters NS, Robinson DO, Lucassen A, Behr ER, Cook SA: Next generation diagnostics in inherited arrhythmia syndromes : a comparison of two approaches. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013, 6 (1): 94-103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/15/70/prepub

Copyright

© Norsworthy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.