Introduction of the AmpliChip CYP450 Test to a South African cohort: a platform comparative prospective cohort study
© Dodgen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 November 2011
Accepted: 18 January 2013
Published: 29 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Collet Dandara|
|27 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Massimo Gennarelli|
|26 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tyren Mark Dodgen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Collet Dandara|
|3 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Massimo Gennarelli|
|8 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tyren Mark Dodgen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Massimo Gennarelli|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2350-14-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.