CDKL5 gene status in female patients with epilepsy and Rett-like features: two new mutations in the catalytic domain
© Maortua et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 March 2012
Accepted: 25 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Isabel Tejada|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louise Gallagher|
|14 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianpiero Cavalleri|
|16 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Isabel Tejada|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianpiero Cavalleri|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2350-13-68|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.