Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

SRY mutation analysis by next generation (deep) sequencing in a cohort of chromosomal Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) patients with a mosaic karyotype

  • Remko Hersmus1,
  • Hans Stoop1,
  • Erin Turbitt4,
  • J Wolter Oosterhuis1,
  • Stenvert LS Drop3,
  • Andrew H Sinclair4,
  • Stefan J White2 and
  • Leendert HJ Looijenga1Email author
BMC Medical GeneticsBMC series ¿ open, inclusive and trusted201213:108

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-108

Received: 8 March 2012

Accepted: 7 November 2012

Published: 16 November 2012

Abstract

Background

The presence of the Y-chromosome or Y chromosome-derived material is seen in 4-60% of Turner syndrome patients (Chromosomal Disorders of Sex Development (DSD)). DSD patients with specific Y-chromosomal material in their karyotype, the GonadoBlastoma on the Y-chromosome (GBY) region, have an increased risk of developing type II germ cell tumors/cancer (GCC), most likely related to TSPY. The Sex determining Region on the Y gene (SRY) is located on the short arm of the Y-chromosome and is the crucial switch that initiates testis determination and subsequent male development. Mutations in this gene are responsible for sex reversal in approximately 10-15% of 46,XY pure gonadal dysgenesis (46,XY DSD) cases. The majority of the mutations described are located in the central HMG domain, which is involved in the binding and bending of the DNA and harbors two nuclear localization signals. SRY mutations have also been found in a small number of patients with a 45,X/46,XY karyotype and might play a role in the maldevelopment of the gonads.

Methods

To thoroughly investigate the presence of possible SRY gene mutations in mosaic DSD patients, we performed next generation (deep) sequencing on the genomic DNA of fourteen independent patients (twelve 45,X/46,XY, one 45,X/46,XX/46,XY, and one 46,XX/46,XY).

Results and conclusions

The results demonstrate that aberrations in SRY are rare in mosaic DSD patients and therefore do not play a significant role in the etiology of the disease.

Keywords

Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) Chromosomal-DSD SRY Next generation (deep) sequencing Mutation

Background

The development of a mammalian embryo into either female or male is primarily dependent on the sex chromosomal constitution, being XX and XY respectively. Normal male (46,XY) sex determination relies on the presence of the Y-chromosome, specifically on expression of SRY at the appropriate time and place during gonad development. Timely expression of this gene above a critical threshold is necessary to trigger testis formation [1, 2]. If sufficient SRY is present, SOX9 will be up-regulated, leading to the formation of pre-Sertoli cells [3]. This will further orchestrate the formation of a functional testis, ultimately leading to the development of male primary and secondary sex characteristics [2]. In a 46,XX constitution, (i.e. the absence of the Y-chromosome and SRY) supportive cells in the gonad will, under the influence of FOXL2, WNT4, and RSPO1 amongst others, develop as granulosa and theca cells, leading to the formation of a functional ovary and female primary and secondary sex characteristics [2].

Turner syndrome (TS) is characterized by gonadal dysgenesis, short stature, and dysmorphic features (neck webbing amongst others). In 6 to 11% of cases a cell line with a normal or abnormal Y-chromosome is identified by standard cytogenetic techniques [4]. Patients with chromosomal DSD as a result of a 45,X/46,XY karyotype (mixed gonadal dysgenesis) may present with a wide spectrum of phenotypes ranging from normal male through ambiguous genitalia to female with a TS phenotype [5]. They are characterized by the presence of dysgenetic testis and/or streak gonads, with persistence of the Müllerian ducts and inadequate virilization, and classically have a 45,X/46,XY karyotype. Y-chromosome mosaicism may lead to virilization and modifications in the female phenotype of TS patients, although a direct correlation between presence of the Y-chromosome and gonadal differentiation pattern has not been found [6, 7]. The presence of a specific region of the Y-chromosome in TS patients is correlated with an increased risk of developing a GCC, namely the GonadoBlastoma on Y region (GBY, i.e. TSPY) [8, 9].

Mutations in the SRY gene are known to be involved in 46,XY sex reversal and are found in approximately 15% of 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis cases [10]. Most of the mutations detected are located in the HMG domain, responsible for the binding and bending of DNA, but several mutations outside of this domain have been reported. Several reports have also described mutations in the SRY gene in individuals with a 45,X/46,XY karyotype [1114], suggesting an additional effect of mutant SRY in the gonadal development of these patients.

Until recently the detection of genetic variants present in <50% of cells was technically challenging, as conventional Sanger sequencing does not routinely reveal such changes. The development of next-generation sequencing technology has greatly simplified this type of analysis, as the potential to generate millions of sequence reads allows the detection and precise quantitation of low frequency variants. This approach has been used for identifying mosaic changes in a range of different samples types [1517]. Here we describe the analysis of the SRY gene using the 454 GS/FLX sequencer in fourteen mosaic patients, including twelve patients with 45,X/46,XY, one patient with a 45,X/46,XX/46,XY, and one patient with a 46,XY/46,XX karyotype, to evaluate the potential role of SRY mutations in these patients.

Results

In total fourteen chromosomal DSD patients with a mosaic karyotype were included in the study: twelve patients with a 45,X/46,XY, one patient with a 45,X/46,XX/46,XY, and one patient with a 46,XY/46,XX sex chromosomal DSD (Table 1). Age at biopsy or gonadectomy ranged from 6 months to 17 years of age (median age 3 years, Table 1). From seven patients the karyotype in peripheral blood lymphocytes was determined (cases 1–3, 5, 8, 12 and 14), and of five patients the gonadal karyotype was known (case 1–4, and 12). Conventional Sanger sequencing of SRY has been performed on genomic DNA from two patients (case 1 and 8), revealing no aberrations. Eight patients (57%) had a male, and six patients (43%) had a female gender. Histology of the gonads showed streak gonads, undifferentiated gonadal tissue, ovotesticular and testicular differentiation patterns. In one case no gonadal tissue was found (case 7), only adnexal structures (fallopian tubes, epididymis and an underdeveloped/dysplastic uterus). In one patient (case 3) a gonadoblastoma was described, being the precursor lesion of the type II germ Cell Tumor/Cancer (GCC) in the dysgenetic gonad [9].
Table 1

Overview of sex, karyotype, SRY variants and gonadal histology in mosaic DSD patients

Case No

Sex

Karyotype (%) [%]

SRY Variants

Histology of the gonads

UGT

OT

NGT

Other

NA

Age biopsy/gonadectomy

T

O

S #

Years

1

F

45X/46XY (10%:90%) [58%/42%]

   

+ (L + R)

     

17

2

M

45,X/46,X,der(Y)(pter-q11.2::q11.2-pter) (44%:56%) [T:71%/29%; UGT: 63%/37%]

 

+ (R)

  

+ (L)

    

6 months

3

F

45X/46XY (56%:44%) [Y present§]

    

+ (GB) (L)

    

17

4

M

45X/46X iso Y (NA) [96%/4%]

   

+ (L)

     

6 months

5

F

45X/46XY (50%:50%) [NA]

   

+ (R)

     

16

6

F

45X/46X iso Y (NA) [NA]

   

+ (L + R)

     

1

7

M

45X/46XY (NA) [NA]

      

+ (R)

  

1

8

M

45X/46XY (50%:50%) [NA]

 

+ (R) &

       

9 months

9

M

45X/46XY (NA) [NA]

        

+

NA

10

F

45X/46XY (NA) [NA]

   

+ (L + R)

     

15

11

M

45X/46XY (NA) [NA]

        

+

3

12

F

46XX/46XY (94%:6%) [T:16%/84%; O: 68%/32%]

     

+ (NA)

   

1

13

M

45X/46XY (NA) [NA]

        

+

5

14

M

45X/46XX/46XY (39%:49%:12%) [NA]

c.49delT 21%

+ (L)

       

3

Reference

Sex

Karyotype (%) [%}

SRY Variants

T

O

S

UGT

OT

NGT

Other

NA

Years

[23]

F

45X/46XXY (65%/35%) [NA@]

p. Y3X

 

+ (L + R) ‡

      

NA

[11]

F

45X/46XY (82%/18%) [L:94%/6% R:98%/2% €]

p.S18N

  

+ (L + R) †

     

17

[11]

F

45X/46X mar (Y) (95.5%/0.5%) [100%/0% €]

p.S18N

  

+ (L + R) †

     

14

[21]

F

45X/46X psu dic (Y)(pter-q11::q11-pter) (40%/60%) [NA@]

p.R59G

  

+ (L + R)

     

24

[12]

F

45X/46XY (80%/20%) [NA]

p.N82X

  

+ (NA) *

     

24

[12]

F

45X/46XY (86%/14%) [NA]

p.L159TfsX167

  

+ (NA) *

     

20

[12]

F

45X/46XY (89%/11%) [NA]

p.Q74H

  

+ (L + R)

     

22

[14]

F

45X/46XY (15%/85%) [NA]

rs11575897

      

+ (GB) (L + R) $

 

13.5

(%): Karyotype in blood, [%]: Gonadal karyotype, GB: Gonadoblastoma, NA: Not Available, T: Testis, O: Ovary, S: Streak, Tissue, OT: OvoTestis,

Ov St: Ovarian Stroma, UGT: Undifferentiated Gonadal, NGT: No Gonadal Tissue, L: Left side, R: Right side.

# Including ovarian stroma.

§ Not further specified.

@ Blood karyotype confirmed on gonadal tissue, not further specified.

& Contains germ cells positive for OCT3/4, TSPY, SCF: at risk for malignant transformation (pre-CIS).

‡ Gonads contained primordial follicles, not further specified.

† Macroscopically streak.

€ Karyotype assessed in fibroblasts cultured from gonads.

* Stromal tissue with similarities to testicular histopathology present, not further specified.

$ Described as Left dysgenetic testis with GB, Right dysgenetic gonad.

Two different PCR products from each of the 14 different samples were generated, such that each could be identified by a specific 10 nt barcode sequence Additional file 1: Table S1). As the first 9 nt of these barcodes (plus the first 3 nt of the SRY-specific sequences) were sufficient to differentiate each of the products, we used the 10th nt of the barcode to estimate the sensitivity of the assay. The advantage of using barcode sequences for this is that they were incorporated during synthesis of the primers used for generating the PCR products. This avoids any low level mosaicism that could theoretically be present in any of the samples being identified, giving misleading sensitivity estimates. Although the 10th barcode nt was close to the 5’ end of the read, and potentially expected to have a low error rate, a previous study of 454 sequencing showed that there was no correlation between error rate and distance from the 5’ end for the first 100 bp of the read [17]. There were 56 different sets of reads, consisting of forward and reverse reads from two PCR products derived from 14 different samples. In total 194,680 reads contained the first 9 bp of any of the different barcodes used, of which only 143 (0.07%) contained a non-matching 10th bp for the corresponding barcode (Additional file 1: Table S1).

When pooling the PCR products prior to sequencing an attempt was made to include equal amounts of each product, and analysis showed that 49/56 sets of reads were within 2x the number of reads of the corresponding mean. The sample with the lowest representation was present at only 0.9%, compared to the expected 1/14 or 7.1%. Despite this low level, an incorrect 10th nt in this sample was detected in only 0.4% (2/495) of reads. These error rates are lower than previously reported figures of ~1%, presumably due to the fact that higher error rates have been shown to correlate with specific sequence features e.g. homopolymer stretches. To allow for this we set our lower threshold for variant detection at 2%.

Using this threshold, a variant in >2% of reads was identified in only one case (Sample 14, Table 1). This was a deletion of T on nucleotide position 197 in the SRY gene (c.49delT in reference sequence NM_003140.1) which was identified in 21% of sequence reads of the 45,X/46,XX/46,XY patient. Subsequent analysis of sample 14 by subcloning PCR product and analyzing 30 samples by conventional Sanger sequencing, could not confirm the deletion originally found by deep sequencing (data not shown).

Discussion

SRY is the founding member of the SRY-like HMG box (SOX) family of transcription factors, characterized by a HMG domain [18]. It is involved in the binding and bending of DNA and contains two nuclear localization signals. Mutations in SRY are present in 10-15% of 46,XY DSD patients [10], and these patients have an increased risk of developing GCC, related to the presence of the GBY region (with TSPY as the most likely candidate gene), and the prolonged expression of OCT3/4 (POU5F1) in the germ cells [8, 19, 20]. Several authors have described mutations in SRY in rare cases with a mosaic sex chromosome constitution [1113, 2123], indicating a potential involvement of SRY in abnormal gonadal development of 45,X/46,X,der(Y) patients.

However, in this study no confirmed mutations in SRY were identified in any of the fourteen cases analyzed. In case no. 14 with a 45,X/46,XX/46,XY karyotype, a deletion of T on position 197 of SRY (ref. seq. NM_003140.1) was found by deep sequencing in 21% of the sequence reads. However, subsequent analysis by sequencing subcloned PCR products only produced wild type SRY sequences, indicating that the original deep sequencing result was most likely a false positive. The results presented here are in agreement with, and extend the data reported by (and others summarized in) Nishi et al. [14], who found only one SRY polymorphism (c.561C → T) in a group of 27 patients (fourteen TS and thirteen mixed gonadal dysgenesis patients. In Table 1, next to the cases analyzed here, an overview of SRY mutations that have been reported in chromosomal DSD cases is shown. The results published until now, showing a SRY mutation in approximately 8% of cases, have all been obtained using conventional Sanger sequencing; the findings presented here show that, although analyzed with a highly sensitive sequencing technique, variations in SRY are not common in patients with a mosaic sex chromosomal constitution.

Shahid et al.[13] describes a mosaic TS patient, with gonadoblastoma, having a frameshift mutation (L94fsX180) in SRY which was inherited from the father. He was found to be mosaic for the SRY mutation and had oligoasthenozoospermia and a testicular GCC (seminoma), which are signs of mild Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome (TDS), the underlying entity proposed by Skakkebæk et. al.[24]. They suggest that the presence of the mutated SRY gene might play a role in the development of gonadoblastoma and seminoma, being the precursor lesion and the invasive component of GCC respectively. However, in the series of samples analyzed here and published by others, no clear link between presence of SRY mutations and development of a gonadoblastoma in these patients can be made (Table 1 and references therein). Domenice et al. [22] describe a patient with partial gonadal dysgenesis and a SRY missense (S18N) mutation whose unaffected male relatives also harbored the mutation, showing no link between SRY mutation and TDS. However, a family with two sisters with 46,XY DSD, pure gonadal dysgenesis and a phenotypically normal brother has been described, in which a SRY frameshift mutation was found in the two sisters and in a mosaic constitution in their father. He showed signs associated with TDS; hypospadias, cryptorchidism, a testicular GCC (seminoma) and oligoasthenozoospermia, suggesting that mutations in SRY may be associated with TDS [25]. If variations in SRY play a significant role in TDS and the development of a testicular GCC remains unresolved, and may warrant further investigation.

It has been found in chimeric XX-XY mouse models that if the gonad contains less than 30% Y-positive cells, the gonad will develop as an ovary, suggesting a correlation between percentage of Y-containing cells and the gonadal differentiation pattern [26]. This seemed at first to be confirmed in humans [27, 28], however two subsequent case reports and analysis of a larger series of samples show no correlation between the degree of gonadal mosaicism and differentiation pattern [6, 29, 30]. The study by Cools et al.[6] revealed no clear correlation between peripheral blood karyotype and gonadal karyotype, or between the gonadal karyotype and differentiation pattern found in the gonads. The inconsistency between gonadal karyotype and gonadal differentiation pattern cannot be explained by the presence of SRY mutations, as they are found only in rare cases, and do not seem to correlate with the differentiation pattern reported [11, 12, 14, 21, 23], even when ascertained by a highly sensitive next generation sequencing approach, as shown in this study.

Conclusion

This is, to our knowledge, the first study using next generation sequencing to detect mutations in the SRY gene in chromosomal DSD patients with a mosaic karyotype. Although a highly sensitive method [1517], no aberrations in SRY were detected. Including the present study, a total of 91 patients with a mosaic sex chromosomal constitution have been screened for SRY mutations, of which only seven (8%) showed a variation. This indicates that mutations in SRY are rare in chromosomal DSD patients with a mosaic karyotype and only play a role in a minority of cases.

Methods

Tissue and DNA samples

Anonymized tissue samples were collected from our diagnostic archives and diagnosed according to WHO standards [31] by an experienced pathologist (JWO). Use of tissue samples for scientific reasons was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee ErasmusMC (MEC 02.981 and CCR2041). Samples were used according to the “Code for Proper Secondary Use of Human Tissue in The Netherlands” as developed by the Dutch Federation of Medical Scientific Societies (FMWV (Version 2002, update 2011). Genomic DNA for sequencing was isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes following standard protocols.

Primer design and PCR amplification

SRY specific priming sequences were designed using reference sequence NG_011751. The complete coding sequence was covered in two overlapping PCR products, generating products of 383 bp and 372 bp. To facilitate analysis on the 454 GS/FLX sequencer (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA) the SRY-specific sequences were modified by adding a) the forward or reverse Titanium Primer and b) a 10 nucleotide multiplex identifier sequence, allowing all samples to be combined into a single reaction. All sequences are outlined in Additional file 1: Table S1. PCR amplification was carried out in 25 μl volumes, using 1.25 U Pfusion High Fidelity Enzyme per reaction. Cycle conditions were: 1 cycle of 94°C for 1 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 62°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 1 min; 1 cycle of 72°C for 10 min. Samples were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel, then purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Sequencing and data analysis

PCR products were pooled in equimolar concentrations and sequenced on the 454 GS/FLX sequencer (454 Life Sciences) at the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, Australia) following manufacturer’s instructions. The reads were de-multi-plexed based on the unique 10 nt MID sequence. Variant detection was performed with NextGene (SoftGenetics, State College PA, USA), using NG_011751 as the reference sequence for alignment. Only variants present in >2% of reads for a given sample were chosen for further analysis.

PCR amplification and sequencing of sample 14

DNA was amplified using SRY specific primers SRY-up 5’-TTCAATTTTGTCGCAACTCTCC-3’ and SRY-rev 5’-GATCGAATGCGTTCATGGGTC-3’, generating a product of 237 bp. PCR amplification was performed using the BD Advantage 2 kit (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Cycle conditions were: 1 cycle of 95°C for 1 min; 45 cycles of 95°C for 45 sec, 57°C for 45 sec, 68°C for 1 min; 1 cycle of 68°C for 3 min. PCR product was analyzed on 1% agarose gel. Subsequently PCR product was cloned, transformed, plated and positive clones were analyzed using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit For Sequencing, following manufacturers instructions (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequences reactions were done with standard T3 and T7 primers, using the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit and run on an ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Life Techologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences were analyzed with MutationSurveyor software (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA) using reference sequence NG_011751.

Authors’ information

Remko Hersmus is financially supported by Translational Research Grant Erasmus MC 2006.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Translational Research Grant Erasmus MC 2006 (RH), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Program Fellowship 491293 and Grant 546478 (SW) and supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program (http://www.vic.gov.au) and the EuroDSD (http://www.eurodsd.eu).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center
(2)
Centre for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research
(3)
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Sophia Children’s Hospital
(4)
Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children’s Hospital

References

  1. Veitia RA, Salas-Cortes L, Ottolenghi C, Pailhoux E, Cotinot C, Fellous M: Testis determination in mammals: more questions than answers. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001, 179 (1–2): 3-16.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Wilhelm D, Palmer S, Koopman P: Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals. Physiol Rev. 2007, 87 (1): 1-28. 10.1152/physrev.00009.2006.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Sekido R, Bar I, Narvaez V, Penny G, Lovell-Badge R: SOX9 is up-regulated by the transient expression of SRY specifically in Sertoli cell precursors. Dev Biol. 2004, 274 (2): 271-279. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.011.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Wolff DJ, Van Dyke DL, Powell CM, Working Group of the ALQAC: Laboratory guideline for Turner syndrome. Genet Med. 2010, 12 (1): 52-55. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181c684b2.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Alvarez-Nava F, Gonzalez S, Soto S, Pineda L, Morales-Machin A: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: a syndrome of broad clinical, cytogenetic and histopathologic spectrum. Genet Couns. 1999, 10 (3): 233-243.PubMed
  6. Cools M, Boter M, van Gurp R, Stoop H, Poddighe P, Lau YF, Drop SL, Wolffenbuttel KP, Looijenga LH: Impact of the Y-containing cell line on histological differentiation patterns in dysgenetic gonads. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007, 67 (2): 184-192. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02859.x.View Article
  7. Cools M, Pleskacova J, Stoop H, Hoebeke P, Van Laecke E, Drop SL, Lebl J, Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LH, Wolffenbuttel KP, et al: Gonadal pathology and tumor risk in relation to clinical characteristics in patients with 45, X/46, XY mosaicism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 96 (7): E1171-1180. 10.1210/jc.2011-0232.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Lau YF, Li Y, Kido T: Gonadoblastoma locus and the TSPY gene on the human Y chromosome. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2009, 87 (1): 114-122. 10.1002/bdrc.20144.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Hersmus R, de Leeuw BH, Wolffenbuttel KP, Drop SL, Oosterhuis JW, Cools M, Looijenga LH: New insights into type II germ cell tumor pathogenesis based on studies of patients with various forms of disorders of sex development (DSD). Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008, 291 (1–2): 1-10.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Cameron FJ, Sinclair AH: Mutations in SRY and SOX9: testis-determining genes. Hum Mutat. 1997, 9 (5): 388-395. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:5<388::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Canto P, de la Chesnaye E, Lopez M, Cervantes A, Chavez B, Vilchis F, Reyes E, Ulloa-Aguirre A, Kofman-Alfaro S, Mendez JP: A mutation in the 5' non-high mobility group box region of the SRY gene in patients with Turner syndrome and Y mosaicism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85 (5): 1908-1911. 10.1210/jc.85.5.1908.PubMed
  12. Shahid M, Dhillon VS, Aslam M, Husain SA: Three new novel point mutations localized within and downstream of high-mobility group-box region in SRY gene in three Indian females with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90 (4): 2429-2435. 10.1210/jc.2004-1110.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Shahid M, Dhillon VS, Khalil HS, Haque S, Batra S, Husain SA, Looijenga LH: A SRY-HMG box frame shift mutation inherited from a mosaic father with a mild form of testicular dysgenesis syndrome in Turner syndrome patient. BMC Med Genet. 2010, 11: 131-10.1186/1471-2350-11-131.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. Nishi MY, Costa EM, Oliveira SB, Mendonca BB, Domenice S: The role of SRY mutations in the etiology of gonadal dysgenesis in patients with 45, X/46, XY disorder of sex development and variants. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011, 75 (1): 26-31. 10.1159/000316536.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Qin W, Kozlowski P, Taillon BE, Bouffard P, Holmes AJ, Janne P, Camposano S, Thiele E, Franz D, Kwiatkowski DJ: Ultra deep sequencing detects a low rate of mosaic mutations in tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum Genet. 2010, 127 (5): 573-582. 10.1007/s00439-010-0801-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  16. Rodriguez-Nieto S, Canada A, Pros E, Pinto AI, Torres-Lanzas J, Lopez-Rios F, Sanchez-Verde L, Pisano DG, Sanchez-Cespedes M: Massive parallel DNA pyrosequencing analysis of the tumor suppressor BRG1/SMARCA4 in lung primary tumors. Hum Mutat. 2011, 32 (2): E1999-2017. 10.1002/humu.21415.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Gilles A, Meglecz E, Pech N, Ferreira S, Malausa T, Martin J-F: Accuracy and quality assessment of 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12 (1): 245-10.1186/1471-2164-12-245.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  18. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, Foster JW, Frischauf AM, Lovell-Badge R, Goodfellow PN: A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature. 1990, 346 (6281): 240-244. 10.1038/346240a0.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Page DC: Hypothesis: a Y-chromosomal gene causes gonadoblastoma in dysgenetic gonads. Development. 1987, 101 (Suppl): 151-155.PubMed
  20. Looijenga LH, Hersmus R, Oosterhuis JW, Cools M, Drop SL, Wolffenbuttel KP: Tumor risk in disorders of sex development (DSD). Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 21 (3): 480-495. 10.1016/j.beem.2007.05.001.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Fernandez R, Marchal JA, Sanchez A, Pasaro E: A point mutation, R59G, within the HMG-SRY box in a female 45, X/46, X, psu dic(Y)(pter– > q11::q11– > pter). Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (3): 242-246. 10.1007/s00439-002-0767-6.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Domenice S, Yumie Nishi M, Correia Billerbeck AE, Latronico AC, Aparecida Medeiros M, Russell AJ, Vass K, Marino Carvalho F, Costa Frade EM, Prado Arnhold IJ, et al: A novel missense mutation (S18N) in the 5' non-HMG box region of the SRY gene in a patient with partial gonadal dysgenesis and his normal male relatives. Hum Genet. 1998, 102 (2): 213-215. 10.1007/s004390050680.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Takagi A, Imai A, Tamaya T: A novel sex-determining region on Y (SRY) nonsense mutation identified in a 45, X/47, XYY female. Fertil Steril. 1999, 72 (1): 167-169. 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00168-5.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Skakkebaek NE: Testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Horm Res. 2003, 60 Suppl 3: 49-PubMed
  25. Isidor B, Capito C, Paris F, Baron S, Corradini N, Cabaret B, Leclair MD, Giraud M, Martin-Coignard D, David A, et al: Familial frameshift SRY mutation inherited from a mosaic father with testicular dysgenesis syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 94 (9): 3467-3471. 10.1210/jc.2009-0226.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Palmer SJ, Burgoyne PS: In situ analysis of fetal, prepuberal and adult XX––XY chimaeric mouse testes: Sertoli cells are predominantly, but not exclusively, XY. Development. 1991, 112 (1): 265-268.PubMed
  27. Reddy KS, Sulcova V, Ho CK, Conner ED, Khurana A: An infant with a mosaic 45,X/46,X,psu dic(Y) (pter-- > q11.2::q11.2-- > pter) karyotype and mixed gonadal dysgenesis studied for extent of mosaicism in the gonads. Am J Med Genet. 1996, 66 (4): 441-444. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19961230)66:4<441::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Reddy KS, Sulcova V: Pathogenetics of 45, X/46, XY gonadal mosaicism. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998, 82 (1–2): 52-57.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Petrusevska R, Beudt U, Schafer D, Schneider M, Brude E, Leitner C, Heller K, Arnemann J: Distribution of marker-Y chromosome containing cells in different tissues of a Turner mosaic patient with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Clin Genet. 1996, 49 (5): 261-266.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Queipo G, Zenteno JC, Pena R, Nieto K, Radillo A, Dorantes LM, Erana L, Lieberman E, Soderlund D, Jimenez AL, et al: Molecular analysis in true hermaphroditism: demonstration of low-level hidden mosaicism for Y-derived sequences in 46, XX cases. Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (3): 278-283. 10.1007/s00439-002-0772-9.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Woodward PJ, Heidenreich A, Looijenga LHJ, et al: Testicular germ cell tumors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours Pathology and Genetics of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Edited by: Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhann IA. 2004, Lyon: IARC Press, 217-278.
  32. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/13/108/prepub

Copyright

© Hersmus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.