Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Boyden |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Iris Eisenberg - Loebl |
11 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - May Christine Malicdan |
23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sabine Krause |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Boyden |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Iris Eisenberg - Loebl |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sabine Krause |
7 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - May Christine Malicdan |
23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Boyden |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - May Christine Malicdan |
21 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Steven Boyden |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-12-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.