Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

SERPINE2 haplotype as a risk factor for panlobular type of emphysema

  • Mari K Kukkonen1,
  • Emmi Tiili1,
  • Satu Hämäläinen1,
  • Tapio Vehmas1,
  • Panu Oksa1,
  • Päivi Piirilä2 and
  • Ari Hirvonen1Email author
BMC Medical Genetics201112:157

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-157

Received: 18 February 2011

Accepted: 7 December 2011

Published: 7 December 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Feb 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Risch
2 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Wan
21 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Yang
15 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Yang
28 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Wan
4 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Risch
19 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 8
19 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
7 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 9
7 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
4 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 10
4 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
18 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ari Hirvonen
Resubmission - Version 11
18 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
7 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
7 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2350-12-157

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
(2)
Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology

Advertisement