Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Genetic selection? A study of individual variation in the enzymes of folate metabolism

  • Barbara A Jennings1Email author,
  • Gavin A Willis2,
  • Jane Skinner1 and
  • Caroline L Relton3
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Genetics201011:18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-18

Received: 2 June 2009

Accepted: 1 February 2010

Published: 1 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Genetic variation in folate metabolism has been associated with survival in utero, the success of in vitro fertilisation, multiple pathologies and longevity.

Methods

We have looked at the prevalence of genetic variants of the enzymes MTHFR and TYMS in 2,898 DNA samples derived from five cohorts collected in the United Kingdom. The simultaneous analysis of genetic variants of the MTHFR and TYMS loci was carried out to investigate a putative gene-gene interaction that was first observed in an elderly male population from Norfolk.

Results

We have made a consistent observation in five population cohorts; the proportion of individuals who are homozygous for the 2R allele of the 5'UTR TYMS polymorphism is less in individuals who are homozygous for the T allele of MTHFR 677 than in individuals homozygous for the C allele of MTHFR 677 (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

These data may suggest a gene-gene interaction and could be evidence of genetic selection, with some pregnancies more or less viable as a consequence of genetic variation. If these genetic phenomena affect the way folate is handled at the cellular level in utero it is possible that maternal folic acid intake may over-ride such genetic selection.

Background

Folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism is essential for nucleotide synthesis, methionine synthesis and for DNA methylation and depends on a number of enzymes that are functionally polymorphic. SNPs and other polymorphisms of the genes MTHFR, MTRR and TYMS have been associated with cardiovascular disease, neural tube defects, Down syndrome and leukaemia [14]. Adequate dietary folate, and its efficient metabolism have well-established roles in disease prevention; deficiency is associated with increased risk of neural tube defects, vascular disease, cancer and anaemia [5].

Proposals for the mandatory fortification of flour with folate in the United Kingdom are driven by the importance of this B vitamin to the development of the early embryo [6]. Embryo development and viability has been the subject of many epidemiological studies of genetic variants, including, and possibly predominantly, in those genes involved in folate metabolism [24, 7]. B-vitamin status and folate metabolism have been shown to influence the outcome of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) [8, 9]. Women who are homozygous for a variant of the gene MTHFR (1298A>C) were less likely to produce a live-birth than other women undergoing IVF and the chances of a twin birth increased with plasma and red cell folate concentrations [8]. The authors proposed that the woman's genotype is linked to her potential to produce good quality embryos and that this, coupled with folate status, increases the likelihood of IVF resulting in live births. Haggarty et al also observed an association between raised concentrations of homocysteine and an increase in the risk of miscarriage in their study of women undergoing IVF and elevated homocysteine levels has been linked recurrent pregnancy loss previously [10].

A meta-analysis has demonstrated that maternal hyperhomocysteinaemia (a metabolic consequence of low folate status) is associated with orofacial cleft and congenital heart defects [11], but the authors found no independent association between these congenital malformations and MTHFR genotype in either the mothers or children. However, the negative in utero effect of raised homocysteine has been proposed by Lucock and Yates as one of the mechanisms by which the genetic variant, MTHFR 677C>T, compromises the viability of a pregnancy when dietary folate levels are inadequate [12]. These authors also hypothesise that when folate levels are unrestricted, there is a survival advantage in utero for homozygotes for the 677C>T allele because that genotype will increase the levels of 5,10 methylene tetrahydrofolate favouring DNA synthesis and stability. This hypothesis is supported by the authors of a recent study of the prevalence of this genotype in adult populations and in DNA samples taken from spontaneous abortions, they present evidence for the selection of the 677C>T allele associated with increased folate intake by women in the peri-conceptional period [13].

The MTHFR 677C>T variant is associated with raised homocysteine concentrations and lower enzyme concentrations [14]. Association studies of the MTHFR 677C>T variant and adverse pregnancy outcomes have in the main concluded that this variant is important in the pathogenesis of adverse pregnancy outcomes [15]. Less compelling evidence is available for TYMS genetic variants [16], one of which is a 5'UTR repeat variant (2R/3R) and the rare 2R variant is associated with lower TYMS expression and plasma homocysteine [17]. The simultaneous analysis of multiple genetic variants allows the consideration of additive, synergistic and compensating variants of folate metabolism. Disease association studies of two or more enzyme variants of folate metabolism are few, but suggest the possibility of gene-gene interactions or epistasis. One study has demonstrated a multiplicative effect on phenotype for the MTHFR 677C>T and MTRR 66G>A genotype combinations in relation to Down syndrome [4]. Another study demonstrated that three genotype combinations of the loci MTRR/FOLH1; MTHFR 677/CBS and MTHFR 677/MTRR increase the risk of neural tube defects [7].

A functional study of MTHFR and TYMS has shown that these enzymes compete for limiting supplies of folate required for homocysteine methylation [17]; which illustrates the likelihood that certain steps in one-carbon metabolism present bottlenecks for the distribution of folate species, and enzyme variants in these steps may be important.

We and others have previously found evidence for depletion of individuals homozygous for MTHFR 677C>T relative to younger cohorts, and postulated it to be due to genotype-specific survival [1820]. Because of observations made in cross-sectional population studies to explore the impact of genetic variants of the enzymes MTHFR and TYMS on survival in elderly cohorts, we have studied the prevalence of two polymorphisms in younger populations. The MTHFR and TYMS loci are found on chromosomes 1 and 18 respectively so linkage disequilibrium will not explain any digenic phenomena observed.

Methods

Subjects

The polymorphic locus MTHFR 677C>T and the 5'UTR repeat variant of TYMS (2R/3R) were co-analysed in 2,898 DNA samples from the following 5 population cohorts.

Cohort 1

DNA extracted from 1178 blood samples collected from an elderly male population undergoing full blood counts in primary care or as patients at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Mean age = 84 years [range 70-99 years].

Cohort 2

DNA extracted from 438 blood samples collected from an elderly female population undergoing full blood counts in primary care or as patients at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Mean age = 92 years [range 89-104 years].

Cohort 3

DNA was extracted from 409 blood samples collected from a young female population undergoing full blood counts in primary care or as patients at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Mean age = 27 years [range 18-40 years].

Cohort 4

DNA was analysed from 398 blood samples from apparently healthy male volunteers recruited through a local community media-advertising campaign for a genetic and iron homeostasis study [21]. Mean age = 60 years [range 40-80 years]. The MTHFR data from this cohort has been described previously [22].

Cohort 5

DNA was obtained from 475 female volunteers from North Cumbria Community Genetics Project (NCCGP) [23]. Mean age of whole NCCGP cohort = 28 years [range 16-44 years].

Genotyping

DNA extraction and genotyping

High molecular weight DNA was sub-aliquoted onto 96 well plates at a concentration of approximately 100 ng/μl. All subsequent reactions were also performed in 96 well plates. The PCR reactions comprised of 100 ng DNA, 200 nmol/L of each primer and 1 × PCR Thermo Start Mastermix (ABgene UK, Epsom, England) in a 25 μl volume. The PCR conditions for each assay are shown in table 1.
Table 1

Description of PCR Assays

GENE

SNP I.D. or description

MTHFR

rs1801133

TYMS

5'UTR EX1+52CCGCGCCACTTC

GCTGCCTCCGTCCCC

Rare allelic form

(amino acid changes)

677C>T (A222V)

2R

[17]

Sense primer and antisense primer

GGGTCAGAAGCATATCAGTCATG

CACAAAGCGGAAGAATGTGTC

AAAAGGCGCGCGGAAG

GCCGGCCACAGGCAT

Annealing temperature, cycle number

55°C, 38 cycles

61°C, 38 cycles

PCR product size in base pairs

326

111 or 139

Restriction enzyme (number of units) or size of ins/del

Hinf I (0.2), buffer 2

28 bp repeat visible by gel electrophoresis

Fragment sizes for common allele in base pairs.

Fragment sizes for rare allele in base pairs.

104 and 222

102, 166 and 53

139

111

The MTHFR assay required restriction digestion prior to gel electrophoresis. 10 μl of PCR product was digested overnight at 37°Cina20 μl reaction volume. The enzyme and buffer used (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) are described in table 1.

The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1 × Tris/Borate/EDTA, 3% Metaphor agarose (FMC Bioproducts, Lichfield, UK) gel in a stretch-wide apparatus (ABgene, Epsom, UK) at 80 V for 50 minutes.

Quality assurance

Gel analysis data were screened independently by two scientists (GW, BJ) and approximately 10% of the samples were genotyped a second time to check for concordance. A duplication of the MTHFR genotyping for 264 samples showed 100% concordance. A duplication of the TYMS genotyping for 362 samples showed 99.2% concordance and resulted in 3 reassigned genotypes. Furthermore, 4 samples that carried the rare 4 repeat allele were excluded from the analysis. The overall success rate for genotyping (in primary genotyping and re-analyses) was 99.6% for the MTHFR locus and 97.2% for the TYMS locus.

The samples from cohorts 1 to 4 were also genotyped for MTHFR 1298 (rs1801131) and found to be in complete linkage disequilibrium with MTHFR 677 as expected.

Statistics

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE); The χ2-test was used to analyse the frequencies of genotypes detected for each locus and relative fitness ratios were estimated for homozygotes compared to heterozygotes.

We tested the hypothesis that the proportion of individuals homozygous for the 2R allele of the 5'UTR TYMS polymorphism was lower in the group homozygous for the T allele of MTHFR 677 than in the group homozygous for the C allele of MTHFR 677 using a one-sided Fisher's exact test for each population. We used Stouffer's consensus combined P-value test, as described and recommended in Rice (1990), which is designed to combine the P-values from a set of independent tests addressing the same hypothesis [24].

Ethics

Ethical approval for the study of anonymised DNA samples of groups 1 to 4 was obtained from Norwich and Waveney LREC. Ethical approval for the study of group 5 was obtained from Leeds West MREC.

Results

Genotyping

We have simultaneously determined the MTHFR 677 and TYMS 5'UTR genotype frequencies using DNA samples from 5 population cohorts comprising 2,898 individuals. The prevalence data and deviations from HWE are described in table 2 in addition to the relative fitness ratios for homozygotes compared to heterozygotes. Data are only presented for those samples that were successfully genotyped at both loci and which carried either the 2R or 3R allele at the TYMS locus.
Table 2

The MTHFR and TYMS genotype distributions, relative fitnesses and deviations from HWE of the genotypes in the 5 populations from Norfolk and Cumbria

MTHFR

 

CC

CT

TT

Relative fitness

CC vs CT

Relative fitness

TT vs CT

Deviation from HWE

Cohort 1

Observed

486.0

564.0

128.0

0.92

0.85

0.063

 

Expected

500.7

534.6

142.7

   

Cohort 2

Observed

206.0

191.0

41.0

0.98

0.95

0.824

 

Expected

207.5

187.9

42.5

   

Cohort 3

Observed

179.0

178.0

52.0

1.06

1.11

0.445

 

Expected

175.6

184.8

48.6

   

Cohort 4

Observed

166.0

202.0

30.0

0.81

0.61

0.003

 

Expected

179.1

175.8

43.1

   

Cohort 5

Observed

185.0

214.0

76.0

1.08

1.13

0.287

 

Expected

179.5

225.0

70.5

   

TYMS

 

3_3

2_3

2_2

Relative fitness

3_3 vs 3_2

Relative fitness

2_2 vs 3_2

Deviation from HWE

Cohort 1

Observed

350.0

541.0

287.0

1.16

1.18

0.007

 

Expected

326.8

587.3

263.8

   

Cohort 2

Observed

126.0

216.0

96.0

1.02

1.01

0.848

 

Expected

125.0

218.0

95.0

   

Cohort 3

Observed

129.0

180.0

100.0

1.24

1.28

0.022

 

Expected

117.3

203.5

88.3

   

Cohort 4

Observed

124.0

184.0

90.0

1.14

1.16

0.189

 

Expected

117.2

197.6

83.2

   

Cohort 5

Observed

146.0

240.0

89.0

0.96

0.94

0.641

 

Expected

149.0

234.1

92.0

   

Observed and expected genotype frequencies and deviations from HWE were calculated from the prevalence data for the MTHFR 677 and TYMS 5'UTR loci in 2898 samples that were simultaneously genotyped at both loci

We observed that the proportion of individuals who are homozygous for the TYMS 2R allele is different in the two groups of homozygotes for the MTHFR 677; the proportion of individuals who are homozygous for the 2R allele of the 5'UTR TYMS polymorphism in individuals with the C>T allele of MTHFR 677 is less than the proportion of individuals who are homozygous for the 2R allele in homozygotes for the C allele of MTHFR 677 (see figure 1). We first made this observation in the elderly Norfolk cohorts 1 and 2. Therefore, to test if this observation was a real phenomenon, we analysed the MTHFR and TYMS genotypes in new populations and subsequently made the same observation in Norfolk cohorts 3 and 4 and in cohort 5, the female volunteers from North Cumbria Community Genetics Project [23]. The observations were consistent in all populations studied.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2350-11-18/MediaObjects/12881_2009_Article_579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Differences in distributions of the TYMS 2R_2R homozygous genotype for each of the homozygous MTHFR genotypes.

Statistics

We found for all populations tested that the proportion of individuals who are homozygous for the TYMS 2R allele was lower in the TT homozygotes for MTHFR 677 than the CC homozygotes, but the individual tests were not significant (Table 3). The consensus combined p-value test [23] was significant (p = 0.02). Removing the hypothesis-generating cohorts 1 and 2 from the analysis, the consensus p-value was still significant (p = 0.04) for cohorts 3, 4 and 5 only.
Table 3

Distribution of TYMS homozygote status for MTHFR homozygotes

 

TYMS

 

Cohort 1

Cohort 2

Cohort 3

Cohort 4

Cohort 5

MTHFR

2_2

Other

2_2

Other

2_2

Other

2_2

Other

2_2

Other

CC

131

355

50

156

53

126

39

127

41

144

TT

27

101

9

32

10

42

4

26

13

63

P*

 

0.11

 

0.46

 

0.09

 

0.16

 

0.23

Consensus P 0.02 (all cohorts), 0.04 (cohorts 3, 4 and 5 only)

* One-sided Fisher's exact test

Obtained using Stouffer's consensus combined P-value test [24]

Discussion

We have observed a consistent gene-gene interaction in 5 different cohorts. Certain genotypes are differentially represented in these populations and this could be evidence of genetic selection during early development; in gamete formation or in utero, with some gametes or pregnancies more or less viable because of variation in the way folate is handled at the cellular level, the metabolism of folate being the link between these enzymes and their genetic loci.

There is published evidence for significant genome-wide transmission distortion [25] which could be caused by genetic and/or environmental influences on gamete selection and embryo viability. Ebisch et al demonstrated that sperm concentration can be raised with folic acid and zinc sulphate supplementation, but only in males who are homozygous for the 677C genotype [26]. Lucock and Yates have hypothesised that when folate levels are unrestricted, there is a survival advantage in utero for homozygotes for the 677C>T allele because that genotype will increase the levels of 5,10 methylene tetrahydrofolate favouring DNA synthesis and stability [12]. The investigations by Mayor-Olea et al found that the wild type, 677CC, genotype is almost absent in spontaneous abortions suggesting that this genotype may protect against pregnancy loss. However, they also interpret the increase in the prevalence of the T allele alongside the use of peri-conceptional folic acid as an indication that an environmental factor can lead to the genetic selection for the T allele or permit the survival of deleterious genotypes [13].

Our observation could not be caused by any simple genotyping error because the relationship observed between MTHFR and TYMS is independent of heterogeneity in the allele frequencies for the individual polymorphisms between the cohorts. During the course of these experiments we investigated the possibility of technical artefacts because it can be seen from table 2 that some of the individual gene frequencies were out of HWE (see MTHFR frequency for cohort 4 and TYMS frequencies for cohorts 1 and 3) and genotyping errors could explain this. Undigested PCR product in the analysis of the MTHFR 677 polymorphism, and preferential amplification of the TYMS allele with 2 rather than 3 repeats could produce erroneous data for the individual genotypes. Although only a single laboratory assay was used for each genotype analysis, the DNA quality and data interpretation checks described in the methods provide confidence in the reproducibility of our methods. Futhermore, while genotyping errors could result in perturbation of HWE they would not generate the significant co-segregation of MTHFR and TYMS genotypes described.

Deviation from HWE is also possible if there are selective advantages for particular genotypes. A selective advantage for particular MTHFR genotypes could lead to deviations from HWE in the general population; heterozygote advantage occurs when environmental situations lead to heterozygous individuals for some disease alleles having increased fitness over both homozygous genotypes. In the older cohorts (1, 2 and 4) in this study both homozygous groups showed a reduced fitness relative to the heterozygotes for MTHFR 677 (see table 2). We and others have previously found evidence for depletion of individuals homozygous for the MTHFR 677C>T relative to younger cohorts, and postulated it to be due to genotype-specific fatal disease [1820, 24]. However, given that the interaction between MTHFR and TYMS is found in all age groups, this interaction cannot be interpreted as an age-related survival factor; i.e. the death of some individuals from genotype-specific fatal disease does not explain the observation.

Given that all of the subjects from our study were born before the influence of folate related public health initiatives, could B-vitamin supplementation affect the biological phenomena that we and others have described? Haggarty et al report that folic acid intervention has not resulted in genetic selection in favour of the MTHFR 677T allele [27], however this does not take into account potential gene-gene interactions at other folate-related loci and does not discount the possibility that numerous genetic variants may act in concert to exert selective pressure.

Conclusions

Our data may suggest a gene-gene interaction and could be evidence of genetic selection, with some pregnancies more or less viable as a consequence of genetic variation. If these genetic phenomena affect the way folate is handled at the cellular level in utero it is possible that maternal folic acid intake may over-ride such genetic selection. Our findings should now be tested in independent population cohorts.

Notes

Abbreviations

HUGO: 

approved nomenclature used for the gene loci

CBS: 

cystathionine-beta-synthase

FOLH1

folate hydrolase (prostate-specific membrane antigen) 1

MTHFR

5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (NADPH)

MTRR

methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase

TYMS

thymidylate synthetase

HWE: 

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The funding for this study came from the University of East Anglia. Della Heron carried out most of the DNA extractions and gave technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia
(2)
Department of Molecular Genetics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
(3)
Institute for Ageing and Health and Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Royal Victoria Infirmary

References

  1. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK: Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: evidence on causality from a meta-analysis. Bmj. 2002, 325 (7374): 1202-10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kirke PN, Mills JL, Molloy AM, Brody LC, O'Leary VB, Daly L, Murray S, Conley M, Mayne PD, Smith O, et al: Impact of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism on risk of neural tube defects: case-control study. Bmj. 2004, 328 (7455): 1535-1536. 10.1136/bmj.38036.646030.EE.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Shields DC, Kirke PN, Mills JL, Ramsbottom D, Molloy AM, Burke H, Weir DG, Scott JM, Whitehead AS: The "thermolabile" variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and neural tube defects: An evaluation of genetic risk and the relative importance of the genotypes of the embryo and the mother. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 64 (4): 1045-1055. 10.1086/302310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobbs CA, Sherman SL, Yi P, Hopkins SE, Torfs CP, Hine RJ, Pogribna M, Rozen R, James SJ: Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism as maternal risk factors for Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 67 (3): 623-630. 10.1086/303055.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lucock M: Is folic acid the ultimate functional food component for disease prevention?. Bmj. 2004, 328 (7433): 211-214. 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.211.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Health: Report on health social subjects. 50. Folic acid and the prevention of disease. Report of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy. 2000, London: The Stationary OfficeGoogle Scholar
  7. Relton CL, Wilding CS, Pearce MS, Laffling AJ, Jonas PA, Lynch SA, Tawn EJ, Burn J: Gene-gene interaction in folate-related genes and risk of neural tube defects in a UK population. J Med Genet. 2004, 41 (4): 256-260. 10.1136/jmg.2003.010694.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Haggarty P, McCallum H, McBain H, Andrews K, Duthie S, McNeill G, Templeton A, Haites N, Campbell D, Bhattacharya S: Effect of B vitamins and genetics on success of in-vitro fertilisation: prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2006, 367 (9521): 1513-1519. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68651-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boxmeer JC, Macklon NS, Lindemans J, Beckers NG, Eijkemans MJ, Laven JS, Steegers EA, Steegers-Theunissen RP: IVF outcomes are associated with biomarkers of the homocysteine pathway in monofollicular fluid. Hum Reprod. 2009, 24 (5): 1059-1066. 10.1093/humrep/dep009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelen WL, Blom HJ, Steegers EA, den Heijer M, Eskes TK: Hyperhomocysteinemia and recurrent early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2000, 74 (6): 1196-1199. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01595-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Verkleij-Hagoort A, Bliek J, Sayed-Tabatabaei F, Ursem N, Steegers E, Steegers-Theunissen R: Hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR polymorphisms in association with orofacial clefts and congenital heart defects: a meta-analysis. Am J Med Genet A. 2007, 143A (9): 952-960. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucock M, Yates Z: Folic acid - vitamin and panacea or genetic time bomb?. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6 (3): 235-240. 10.1038/nrg1558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayor-Olea A, Callejon G, Palomares AR, Jimenez AJ, Gaitan MJ, Rodriguez A, Ruiz M, Reyes-Engel A: Human genetic selection on the MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism. BMC Med Genet. 2008, 9 (1): 104-10.1186/1471-2350-9-104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bailey LB, Gregory JF: Polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and other enzymes: metabolic significance, risks and impact on folate requirement. J Nutr. 1999, 129 (5): 919-922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Botto LD, Yang Q: 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151 (9): 862-877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilding CS, Relton CL, Sutton MJ, Jonas PA, Lynch SA, Tawn EJ, Burn J: Thymidylate synthase repeat polymorphisms and risk of neural tube defects in a population from the northern United Kingdom. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004, 70 (7): 483-485. 10.1002/bdra.20038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Trinh BN, Ong CN, Coetzee GA, Yu MC, Laird PW: Thymidylate synthase: a novel genetic determinant of plasma homocysteine and folate levels. Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (3): 299-302. 10.1007/s00439-002-0779-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heijmans BT, Gussekloo J, Kluft C, Droog S, Lagaay AM, Knook DL, Westendorp RG, Slagboom EP: Mortality risk in men is associated with a common mutation in the methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR). Eur J Hum Genet. 1999, 7 (2): 197-204. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Faure-Delanef L, Quere I, Chasse JF, Guerassimenko O, Lesaulnier M, Bellet H, Zittoun J, Kamoun P, Cohen D: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase thermolabile variant and human longevity. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60 (4): 999-1001.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Jennings BA, Wimperis JZ, Tickner T, Naidu R, Willis G: MTHFR 677 polymorphism in an elderly patient cohort. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2003, 11: S249-Google Scholar
  21. Roe MA, Heath AL, Oyston SL, Macrow C, Hoogewerff JA, Foxall R, Dainty JR, Majsak-Newman G, Willis G, Fairweather-Tait SJ: Iron absorption in male C282Y heterozygotes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81 (4): 814-821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khandanpour N, Willis G, Meyer FJ, Armon MP, Loke YK, Wright AJ, Finglas PM, Jennings BA: Peripheral arterial disease and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutations: A case-control study and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009, 49 (3): 711-718. 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chase DS, Tawn EJ, Parker L, Jonas P, Parker CO, Burn J: The North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. J Med Genet. 1998, 35 (5): 413-416. 10.1136/jmg.35.5.413.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Rice WR: A Consensus Combined P-Value Test and the Family-Wide Significance of Component Tests. Biometrics. 1990, 46 (2): 303-308. 10.2307/2531435.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zollner S, Wen X, Hanchard NA, Herbert MA, Ober C, Pritchard JK: Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (1): 62-72. 10.1086/381131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ebisch IM, van Heerde WL, Thomas CM, Put van der N, Wong WY, Steegers-Theunissen RP: C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism interferes with the effects of folic acid and zinc sulfate on sperm concentration. Fertil Steril. 2003, 80 (5): 1190-1194. 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02157-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haggarty P, Campbell DM, Duthie S, Andrews K, Hoad G, Piyathilake C, Fraser I, McNeill G: Folic acid use in pregnancy and embryo selection. Bjog. 2008, 115 (7): 851-856.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/11/18/prepub

Copyright

© Jennings et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

Advertisement